Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Kinetic Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 2(3); doi: 10.38007/KME.2021.020306.

Safety Monitoring Method of Underground Pipeline based on Machine Learning and Parameter Statistics

Author(s)

Saravanan Kazemzadeh

Corresponding Author:
Saravanan Kazemzadeh
Affiliation(s)

Vellore Institute of Technology, India

Abstract

Safety is the primary prerequisite for the development of a city. Underground pipelines (UP) carry the development of a city. The research on the SM methods of UP has become a hot topic. This paper combines machine learning (ML) and parameter statistics (PS) to study and analyze the new method of underground pipeline SM. This paper briefly analyzes the layout principle of urban UP and the SM system of the spatial layout of UP, discusses the safety evaluation indexes of UP, combines ML and PS, and studies the new method of SM with bending stress as the most critical safety evaluation index of pipelines; At last, the experimental results show that the new method of merging ML and parameter statistical security monitoring proposed in this paper is effective and feasible.

Keywords

Integration of Machine Learning, Parameter Statistics, Underground Pipelines, New Safety Monitoring Methods

Cite This Paper

Saravanan Kazemzadeh. Safety Monitoring Method of Underground Pipeline based on Machine Learning and Parameter Statistics. Kinetic Mechanical Engineering (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 3: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.38007/KME.2021.020306.

References

[1] Paiva F D, Cardoso R N, Hanaoka G P, et al. Decision-making for financial trading: A fusion approach of machine learning and portfolio selection. Expert Systems with Application, 2019, 115(JAN.):635-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.003

[2] Liu W, Tian Z, Jiang X, et al. A milling cutter state recognition method based on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 122(7-8):3365-3378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10017-5

[3] Gregorio L D, Callegari M, Marin C, et al. A Novel Data Fusion Technique for Snow Cover Retrieval. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2019, PP(99):1-16.

[4] Snow Z, Diehl B, Reutzel E W, et al. Toward in-situ flaw detection in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing through layerwise imagery and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 59(10 October):12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.008

[5] Nazir Q, Shao C. Online tool condition monitoring for ultrasonic metal welding via sensor fusion and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 62(5):806-816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.050

[6] Gerdes N, Hoff C, Hermsdorf J, et al. Hyperspectral imaging for prediction of surface roughness in laser powder bed fusion. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 115(4):1249-1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07274-1

[7] Camargo J, Flanagan W, Csomay-Shanklin N, et al. A Machine Learning Strategy for Locomotion Classification and Parameter Estimation Using Fusion of Wearable Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2021, PP (99):1-1.

[8] Mohammadi M G, Elbestawi M. Real Time Monitoring in L-PBF Using a Machine Learning Approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 2020, 51(4):725-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.102

[9] Aiassa S, Ros P M, Hanitra M, et al. Smart Portable Pen for Continuous Monitoring of Anaesthetics in Human Serum With Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2021, PP(99):1-1.

[10] Snow Z, Diehl B, Reutzel E W, et al. Toward in-situ flaw detection in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing through layerwise imagery and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 59(10 October):12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.008

[11] Ibtehaz N, Rahman M S, Rahman M S. VFPred: A fusion of signal processing and machine learning techniques in detecting ventricular fibrillation from ECG signals. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2019, 49(MAR.):349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2018.12.016

[12] Boughanmi K, Ansari A. Dynamics of Musical Success: A Machine Learning Approach for Multimedia Data Fusion. Journal of Marketing Research, 2021, 58(6):1034-1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211016495

[13] Blasch E, Pham T, Chong C Y, et al. Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence for Sensor Data Fusion-Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2021, 36(7):80-93. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAES.2020.3049030

[14] Agrawal H, Jain P, Joshi A M. Machine learning models for non-invasive glucose measurement: towards diabetes management in smart healthcare. Health and Technology, 2022, 12(5):955-970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-022-00690-7

[15] Habbouche H, Benkedjouh T, Amirat Y, et al. Gearbox Failure Diagnosis Using a Multisensor Data-Fusion Machine-Learning-Based Approach. Entropy, 2021, 23(697):1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060697

[16] Shevchik S, Masinelli G, Kenel C, et al. Deep learning for in situ and real-time quality monitoring in additive manufacturing using acoustic emission. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, PP (9):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2910524

[17] Lee J H, Kim B H, Min Y K. Machine Learning-based Automatic Optical Inspection System with Multimodal Optical Image Fusion Network. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2021, 19(10):3503-3510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0118-1

[18] Sadasivuni S, Saha M, Bhatia N, et al. Fusion of fully integrated analog machine learning classifier with electronic medical records for real-time prediction of sepsis onset. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09712-w