Because of increased exploration depth and increasingly complex geological environment survey area, makes the actual acquired seismic exploration data contains a lot of noise, the noise composition is serious interference signal effectively, affect the signal to noise ratio and resolution of the seismic data, reduce the quality of the seismic exploration data, to the subsequent inversion and interpretation, and finally brought difficulties such as oil and gas exploration work. This paper mainly studies the quality control method of exploration and development data based on machine learning. In this paper, the classification and source of desert noise are analyzed first, and a convolutional neural network with branch structure (BCDNet) is proposed to enhance the ability of extracting effective signal features from desert seismic exploration data, so as to better recover the seismic in-phase axis polluted by desert seismic random noise.

Zhiqiu Yang. Quality Control Method of Exploration and Development Data Based on Machine Learning. Machine Learning Theory and Practice (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 3: 45-52. https://doi.org/10.38007/ML.2020.010306.

[1] Saad O M, Chen Y. Deep denoising autoencoder for seismic random noise attenuation. Geophysics, 2020, 85(4): V367-V376. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0468.1

[2] Lognonné P, Banerdt W B, Pike W T, et al. Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data. Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13(3): 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0536-y

[3] Innocent Oboué Y A S, Chen W, Wang H, et al. Robust damped rank-reduction method for simultaneous denoising and reconstruction of 5D seismic data. Geophysics, 2020, 86(1): V71-V89. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0032.1

[4] Hlebnikov V, Elboth T, Vinje V, et al. Noise types and their attenuation in towed marine seismic: A tutorial. Geophysics, 2020, 86(2): W1-W19. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0808.1

[5] Ghaderpour E, Liao W, Lamoureux M P. Antileakage least-squares spectral analysis for seismic data regularization and random noise attenuation. Geophysics, 2018, 83(3): V157-V170. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0284.1

[6] Tibi R, Hammond P, Brogan R, et al. Deep learning denoising applied to regional distance seismic data in Utah. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2020, 111(2): 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200292

[7] Alfonzo M, Oliver D S. Seismic data assimilation with an imperfect model. Computational Geosciences, 2020, 24(2): 889-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09849-0

[8] Kaur H, Fomel S, Pham N. Seismic ground‐roll noise attenuation using deep learning. Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 68(7): 2064-2077. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12985

[9] Carozzi F, Sacchi M D. Robust tensor-completion algorithm for 5D seismic-data reconstruction. Geophysics, 2019, 84(2): V97-V109. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0109.1

[10] Kim D, Davis P, Lekić V, et al. Potential pitfalls in the analysis and structural interpretation of seismic data from the Mars InSight mission. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2020, 111(6): 2982-3002. 

[11] Snover D, Johnson C W, Bianco M J, et al. Deep clustering to identify sources of urban seismic noise in Long Beach, California. Seismological Society of America, 2020, 92(2A): 1011-1022. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200164

[12] Yabe S, Imanishi K, Nishida K. Two-step seismic noise reduction caused by COVID-19 induced reduction in social activity in metropolitan Tokyo, Japan. Earth, Planets and Space, 2020, 72(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01298-9

[13] Somala S N. Seismic noise changes during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of Shillong, India. Natural Hazards, 2020, 103(1): 1623-1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04045-1

[14] Lorentzen R J, Luo X, Bhakta T, et al. History matching the full Norne field model using seismic and production data. SPE Journal, 2019, 24(04): 1452-1467. https://doi.org/10.2118/194205-PA

[15] Bakulin A, Silvestrov I, Dmitriev M, et al. Nonlinear beamforming for enhancement of 3D prestack land seismic data. Geophysics, 2020, 85(3): V283-V296. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0341.1

[16] Lecocq T, Hicks S P, Van Noten K, et al. Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures. Science, 2020, 369(6509): 1338-1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd2438

[17] Ovcharenko O, Kazei V, Kalita M, et al. Deep learning for low-frequency extrapolation from multioffset seismic data. Geophysics, 2019, 84(6): R989-R1001. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0884.1

[18] Xue Y, Cao J, Wang X, et al. Recent developments in local wave decomposition methods for understanding seismic data: application to seismic interpretation. Surveys in Geophysics, 2019, 40(5): 1185-1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09568-2