Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Water Pollution Prevention and Control Project, 2021, 2(1); doi: 10.38007/WPPCP.2021.020106.

Evaluation on Water Pollution Prevention and Control of Wireless Sensor Ecosystem

Author(s)

Pecka Michael

Corresponding Author:
Pecka Michael
Affiliation(s)

Univ Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

Wireless sensor network technology is a new application field, which has been widely concerned in recent years, and has also made good progress in water environment monitoring. With the change of the times and the continuous improvement of the scientific level, the wireless sensor technology was studied. This paper mainly carried out a series of analysis and discussion on the problem of water pollution. The wireless sensor network technology realized the real-time monitoring of pollutants in the water environment and can transmit its data to the user. However, the existing problem is that in the process of practical application, the effect of traditional ecosystem water pollution prevention and control mode is not satisfactory due to high cost and low efficiency. At the same time, due to unreasonable and incomplete network node layout and other factors, a lot of resources were wasted, but still cannot solve the water pollution problem well. Therefore, people need to constantly study and improve wireless sensor network technology to improve the reliability of the whole system, and solve the problems such as the untimely detection of water pollution hidden dangers and the unsatisfactory monitoring and prediction effect of water pollution problems in the traditional ecosystem water pollution prevention and control scheme. This paper proposed an ecosystem water pollution governance model based on wireless sensor technology and combined with local coverage algorithm. Through the comparative analysis of experimental results, it can be seen that the innovative ecosystem water pollution governance model had an average improvement of 14.9% in four performance aspects compared with the traditional ecosystem water pollution governance model.

Keywords

Wireless Sensing, Ecosystems, Water pollution, Prevention and Treatment

Cite This Paper

Pecka Michael. Evaluation on Water Pollution Prevention and Control of Wireless Sensor Ecosystem. Water Pollution Prevention and Control Project (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 53-62. https://doi.org/10.38007/WPPCP.2021.020106.

References

[1] Gaojie Wu. Water pollution management in China: recent incidents and proposed improvements. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply. (2018) 18(2): 603-611. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.139

[2] Singh Upma. Water Pollution due to Discharge of Industrial Effluents with special reference to Uttar Pradesh, India-A review. International Archive of Applied Sciences and Technology. (2018) 9(4): 111-121.

[3] Hanif M. A. Impact of Kapotaksha river water pollution on human health and environment. Progressive agriculture. (2020) 31(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v31i1.48300

[4] Qian Wang. Coevolution of iron, phosphorus, and sulfur speciation during anaerobic digestion with hydrothermal pretreatment of sewage sludge. Environmental Science & Technology. (2020) 54(13): 8362-8372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00501

[5] Fongaro Gislaine. SARS-CoV-2 in human sewage and river water from a remote and vulnerable area as a surveillance tool in Brazil. Food and Environmental Virology. (2021) 14(4): 417-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-021-09487-9

[6] Chaoua Sana. Efficiency of two sewage treatment systems (activated sludge and natural lagoons) for helminth egg removal in Morocco. Journal of infection and public health. (2018) 11(2): 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2017.07.026

[7] Nkhoma Peter R. Recycled water reuse: what factors affect public acceptance? Environmental Conservation. (2021) 48(4): 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689292100031X

[8] Oral Hasan Volkan. A review of nature-based solutions for urban water management in European circular cities: a critical assessment based on case studies and literature. Blue-Green Systems. (2020) 2(1): 112-136. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2020.932

[9] Greenaway Tameika, Kelly S. Fielding. Positive affective framing of information reduces risk perceptions and increases acceptance of recycled water. Environmental Communication. (2020) 14(3): 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1680408

[10] Ahmed Shahid, Saba Ismail. Water pollution and its sources, effects & management: a case study of Delhi. Shahid Ahmed and Saba Ismail (2018)'Water Pollution and its Sources, Effects & Management: A Case Study of Delhi'. International Journal of Current Advanced Research. (2018) 7(2): 10436-10442.

[11] Sarker Bijoyee. Surface and ground water pollution: causes and effects of urbanization and industrialization in South Asia. Scientific Review. (2021) 7(3): 32-41. https://doi.org/10.32861/sr.73.32.41

[12] Pichura Vitalii. Causal regularities of effect of urban systems on condition of hydro ecosystem of Dnieper River. Indian Journal of Ecology. (2020) 47(2): 273-280.

[13] Abdulkarem Mohammed. Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future direction. Structural Health Monitoring. (2020) 19(3): 693-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719854528

[14] Khalaf Osamah Ibrahim, Bayan Mahdi Sabbar. An overview on wireless sensor networks and finding optimal location of nodes. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences. (2019) 7(3): 1096-1101. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i3.645

[15] Nouri Nabil Abdelkader, et al. Accelerated PSO algorithm applied to clients coverage and routers connectivity in wireless mesh networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. (2021) 14(1): 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03283-w