Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Nature Environmental Protection, 2020, 1(4); doi: 10.38007/NEP.2020.010406.

Animal Comfort in Natural Environment Protection Areas Integrating RS and DIS

Author(s)

Mathea Simons

Corresponding Author:
Mathea Simons
Affiliation(s)

Brock University, Canada

Abstract

The progress of biodiversity is an important indicator of ecology and livelihoods. The establishment of natural reserves to protect biodiversity can scientifically and effectively regulate the stability of the biological environment, prevent and reduce species extinction to a certain extent, and ensure the safe and healthy development of the natural ecological environment. It can also play a role in establishing and protecting habitats and even enriching species. RS (Remote sensing) and DIS (Digital information system) help personnel involved in remote detection image monitoring and analysis in the region to quickly respond to emergencies and protect biodiversity and animal comfort. Therefore, this paper analyzes the problems that affect the comfort of animals in natural environment protection areas, and then uses RS and DIS to analyze the processing steps of regional images, and finally proposes corresponding protection strategies to improve the comfort of animals. It can be seen from the comparison that the animal comfort after the optimization of the nature reserve is 19% higher than that before the optimization of the nature reserve, and the ecological monitoring effect is 21.2% higher than that before the optimization of the nature reserve. In short, RS and DIS are of great significance in species monitoring in natural environment protection areas.

Keywords

Animal Comfort Research, Natural Environment Protection Area, Remote Sensing Technology, Digital Information System

Cite This Paper

Mathea Simons. Animal Comfort in Natural Environment Protection Areas Integrating RS and DIS. Nature Environmental Protection (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 4: 46-55. https://doi.org/10.38007/NEP.2020.010406.

References

[1] Robertson, Ian, and Daniel Goldsworthy. "Recognising and defining animal sentience in legislation: A framework for importing positive animal welfare through the five domains model." Monash University Law Review 48.1 (2020): 244-271.

[2] Smith, Adrian J. "PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing." Laboratory animals 52.2 (2018): 135-141.

[3] Apriyani, Lusi, Fahmi Yoesmar AR, and Marta Erwandi. "Comparison of wildlife protection law between Indonesia and the United States." Hasanuddin Law Review 4.2 (2018): 181-193.

[4] Yang, Nian. "Permanently ban wildlife consumption." Science 367.6485 (2020): 1434-1434.

[5] Pearson, Ryan M. "COVID-19 recovery can benefit biodiversity." Science 368.6493 (2020): 838-839.

[6] Mitra, Ishani, Soma Roy, and Ikramul Haque. "Application of molecular markers in wildlife DNA forensic investigations." Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine 4.3 (2018): 156-160.

[7] Lee, Derek E. "Evaluating conservation effectiveness in a Tanzanian community wildlife management area." The Journal of Wildlife Management 82.8 (2018): 1767-1774.

[8] Cetin, Mehmet. "The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area’s effect using satellitia imagines on air quality: a case study of Bursa city." Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 12.10 (2019): 1237-1249.

[9] Cetin, Mehmet. "Climate comfort depending on different altitudes and land use in the urban areas in Kahramanmaras City." Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 13.8 (2020): 991-999.

[10]Cortes-Vazquez, Jose A., and Esteban Ruiz-Ballesteros. "Practising nature: A phenomenological rethinking of environmentality in natural protected areas in Ecuador and Spain." Conservation and Society 16.3 (2018): 232-242.

[11] Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J. "A framework for analyzing and practicing Integrative Governance: The case of global animal and conservation governance." Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36.8 (2018): 1391-1414.

[12] Eid, Ehab, and Ramzi Handal. "Illegal hunting in Jordan: using social media to assess impacts on wildlife." Oryx 52.4 (2018): 730-735.

[13] Wintle, Brendan A., Sarah Legge, and John CZ Woinarski. "After the megafires: What next for Australian wildlife?." Trends in Ecology & Evolution 35.9 (2020): 753-757.

[14] Koh, Lian Pin, Yuhan Li, and Janice Ser Huay Lee. "The value of China’s ban on wildlife trade and consumption." Nature Sustainability 4.1 (2020): 2-4.

[15] Aguilar, Xavier Fernandez. "PPR virus threatens wildlife conservation." Science 362.6411 (2018): 165-166.