In recent years, with the rapid development of economy of people, the development of animal husbandry and animal products quality also more and more important, all kinds of livestock and poultry disease more and more, a serious threat to human health, and the weak animal epidemic prevention system in our country, therefore, actively carry out pig farm animal epidemic prevention management system and legal responsibility research is very necessary. The purpose of this paper is to explore the feasibility of the animal epidemic prevention management system in pig farms and the implementation of the corresponding legal liability, and to analyze the problems in the management of pig farms. This paper makes a detailed investigation of the existing animal epidemic prevention management system of pig farms and the relevant laws and regulations, and on the basis of this, puts forward the scientific methods of formulating the relevant epidemic prevention management system, and probes into the relevant legal responsibilities and obligations. The results show that it is feasible to make use of scientific epidemic prevention management system and legal responsibility to effectively manage the pig farm, which not only effectively prevents the occurrence of animal disease, but also reduces the risk of disease by 45% in the breeding industry, promotes the development of the animal product industry, and increases the income of farmers by up to 35%.

Jiayao Ji. Animal Epidemic Prevention Management System and Legal Liability in Pig Farms. Zoology and Animal Physiology (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 4: 38-49. https://doi.org/10.38007/ZAP.2021.020404.

[1] Chan, K. W., Miller, B. (2015) Capitalist Pigs: Governmentality, Subjectivities, and the Regulation of Pig Farming in Colonial Hong Kong, 1950-1970, Environment and Planning, 33(6), pp. 1022-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815598154

[2] Farouk, A., Alahmadi, A., Ghose, S., & Mashatan, A. (2020) Blockchain Platform for Industrial Healthcare: Vision and Future Opportunities. Computer Communications, 154, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.058

[3] Postma, M., Backhans, A., Collineau, L. (2016) The Biosecurity Status and Its Associations with Production and Management Characteristics in Farrow-to-Finish Pig Herds, Animal, 10(03), pp. 478-489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002487

[4] Kim, M. N., Baek, S. H. (2017) A Study on Ubiquitous Environments Based on the Animal and Plant Management System in Green House, Wireless Personal Communications, 93(1), pp.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3924-2

[5] Watanabe, T., Nakahara, Y., Asakura, S. (2015) Sociological Factors Influencing the Practice and Attitude Towards Pig Farm Hygiene in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan, Journal of Veterinary Epidemiology, 19(2), pp.100-107. https://doi.org/10.2743/jve.19.100

[6] Mackenzie, S. G., Leinonen, I., Ferguson, N. (2015) Accounting for Uncertainty in the Quantification of the Environmental Impacts of Canadian Pig Farming Systems, Journal of Animal Science, 93(6), pp.3130-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8403

[7] Mark, R., Theobald, a., Alberto Sanz-Cobena a, Antonio Vallejo a. (2015) Suitability and Uncertainty of two Models for the Simulation of Ammonia Dispersion from a Pig Farm Located in an Area with Frequent Calm Conditions, Atmospheric Environment, 102(167), pp.167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.056

[8] Rodriguez-Entrena, M., Salazar-Ordonez, M. (2015) Assessing the Potential Effects of the European Union Multilevel Approach to the Coexistence Policy, European Review, 23(4), pp.489-500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798715000332

[9] Lipendele, C. P., Lekule, F. P., Mushi, D. E., (2015) Productivity and Parasitic Infections of Pigs Kept Under Different Management Systems by Smallholder Farmers in Mbeya and Mbozi Districts, Tanzania, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47(6), pp.1121-1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0836-1

[10] Surinder, K., Diksha, K., Vandana, K., Control of Enviornmental Parametrs in A Greenhouse, Fusion: Practice and Applications, (2020) Vol. 1, No. 1, pp: 14-21 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.010102)

[11] Sousa, F. A., Campos, A. T., Cecchin, D. (2017) Thermo-Acoustic Environment of a Pig Farm Facility with Different Superimposed Bed Materials, Journal of Animal Behaviour & Biometeorology, 5(3), pp.78-84. https://doi.org/10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v5n3p78-84

[12] Xiang, X., Li, Q., Khan, S., Khalaf, O.I. (2021) Urban Water Resource Management for Sustainable Environment Planning Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106515

[13] Nevrkla, P., Eva Václavková, Zdeněk Hadaš (2016) Effect of Farm on Productive and Reproductive Performance in Sows of Prestice Black-pied Pig, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(4), pp.1233-1237. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664041233

[14] Croton, G. A. (2018) It's Always Windy in McCain valley: Vicarious Liability Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Hastings Law Journal, 69(2), pp.647-674.

[15] Mugera, A. W., Nyambane, G. G. (2015) Impact of Debt Structure on Production Efficiency and Financial Performance of Broadacre Farms in Western Australia, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59(2), pp.208-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12075