Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science, 2026, 7(1); doi: 10.38007/IJEIS.2026.070111.

The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on the Cross-border Investment Performance of China's Manufacturing Enterprises and the Coping Mechanisms

Author(s)

Tao Pan

Corresponding Author:
Tao Pan
Affiliation(s)

Guangdong Yiyue (Nansha) Law Firm, Guangzhou 511400, Guangdong, China

Abstract

China's manufacturing enterprises have continuously expanded their cross-border investment scale in recent years, and geopolitical risks have become a key factor restricting the stable growth of their overseas investment performance. This study systematically sorts out the practical foundation of China's manufacturing cross-border investment and the current development characteristics of geopolitical risks. It analyzes three core problems exposed in the process of geopolitical risks affecting investment performance, including the deficiencies in enterprise-level risk identification and control systems, the limitations of industry-level coordinated response mechanisms, and the docking gap between national policy guarantees and international cooperation. It proposes a multi-level response mechanism construction plan covering micro, meso and macro dimensions to help enterprises improve risk resistance capabilities and enhance cross-border investment performance.

Keywords

Geopolitical risks; Cross-border investment of manufacturing industry; Investment performance

Cite This Paper

Tao Pan. The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on the Cross-border Investment Performance of China's Manufacturing Enterprises and the Coping Mechanisms. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science (2026), Vol. 7, Issue 1: 88-94. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJEIS.2026.070111.

References

[1] Vaghela Z. Analysis in Global Finance-Analysing the Impact of Geopolitical Factors in Global Finance Markets [J]. European Economics Letters, 2025, 15 (4).

[2] Zhang H, Tian L. Risk hedging: How geopolitical risks affect enterprises' overseas merger and acquisition?[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, 102 (000).

[3] Zhang S, Bian J. Transformations in the international financial order driven by CBDCs: rule challenges under financial sanctions and China's response [J]. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies, 2025, 18 (11).

[4] RongYing,JiangZhida. New Trends and Challenges in Global Governance Transformation [J]. Peace and Development, 2026 (1).

[5] Cui J, Pan J, Song Z. Sourcing and supplying strategies under supply risk of critical components [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2025, 327 (1):136-147.

[6] Huang J, Lin F, Zhang T,et al. Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Resilience: Leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models for Intelligent Automation in the Era of Global Disruptions and Stablecoin Integration [J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2085, 59 (34):48-53.

 [7] Tao M, Roubaud D, Tiwari A K,et al. How do systematic risk spillovers reshape investment outcomes?[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 75(000).

[8] Bhattacharjee A, Sidana N, Goel R,et al. Cross-border ripples: investigating stock market responses to Israel-Hamas conflict in trading partner nations using event study method[J]. Journal of Economic Studies, 2025, 52(4).

[9] Pradhan S K, Stebunovs V,Eld Takáts,et al. Geopolitics Meets Monetary Policy: Decoding Their Impact on Cross-Border Bank Lending[J]. International Finance Discussion Paper, 2025(2025):1-1.

[10] Goldbach S, Nitsch V, Office E L E. Bridge over troubled water? German foreign direct investment in times of geopolitical tensions[J]. 2026.

[11] Ullah S, Xiaopeng D, Anbar D R,et al. Political Risk Management in International Construction: Evidence from Pakistan[J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2025.