The evaluation of scientific research(SR) management in China started late, but developed rapidly. It was not until the 1980s that we began to really pay attention to SR projects and carry out substantive management evaluation activities. However, the state and various ministries and commissions have successively issued rules and regulations on SR management, which has played an important role in standardizing the national scientific and technological evaluation activities, building evaluation institutions, and promoting the development of SR management and evaluation in Colleges and Universities(CAU). This paper studies the evaluation of SR management in CAU based on decision tree algorithm(DTA). In this paper, the process evaluation research of SR project management is carried out. Combining the actual situation and existing problems of university SR management(USRM) evaluation, the DTA is applied to the evaluation of USRM, and the dynamic implementation of the project plan is effectively controlled by the process. Adjust the management strategy of project progress in real time according to the feedback information of project progress, and strive to ensure that the project is completed as expected. The successful implementation of SR management evaluation in CAU based on DTA will help the SR work in CAU to rise to a higher level, which has great practical significance.

James Yong Liao. University Scientific Research Management based on Decision Tree Algorithm Evaluation. Machine Learning Theory and Practice (2022), Vol. 3, Issue 4: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.38007/ML.2022.030409.

[1] Walcott J R. Understanding Educational Inequity: Implications for Teacher Education Programs in Christian CAU. Journal of Research on Christian Education. (2021) 30(3):337-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2021.1990814

[2] Cerrato P, Halamka J, Pencina M. A Proposal for Developing a Platform That Evaluates Algorithmic Equity and Accuracy. BMJ Health and Care Informatics. (2022) 29(1):1351-63. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100423

[3] Chuan C H, Yang J, Wen T J, et al. Predicting Advertising Persuasiveness: A Decision Tree Method for Understanding Emotional (In)Congruence of Ad Placement on YouTube. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising. (2022) 43(2):200-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2021.1963356

[4] Stylos N. An Integrated Duality Theory Framework (IDTF): Marking Pathways for Consumer Decision-Making Researchers in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. (2022) 34(7):2597-2619. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1256

[5] Shang C, Goh C F, Saeidi P. Evaluation of Circular Supply Chains Barriers in the Era of Industry 4.0 Transition Using an Extended Decision-Making Approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. (2022) 35(4/5):1100-1128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2021-0396

[6] Correia A, Paulo águas, Portugal J P. Decisions on Participation in Music Festivals: An Exploratory Research in Portugal. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. (2022) 13(2):164-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-07-2021-0059

[7] Liu C, Pachori K , Rani P. Sustainable Circular Supplier Selection And Evaluation in the Manufacturing Sector Using Pythagorean Fuzzy EDAS Approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. (2022) 35(4/5):1040-1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2021-0187

[8] Kwon J, Li Z , Zhao S, et al. Predicting Crowdfunding Success with Visuals and Speech in Video Ads and Text Ads. European Journal of Marketing. (2022) 56(6):1610-1649. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2020-0029

[9] Silva T D, Wickramasinghe V. STEM Vs Non-STEM Differences in University Teaching and Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Case Of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Educational Management. (2022) 36(5):678-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0272

[10] Brady M, Saxena D, Fellenz M, et al. Bridging the Marketing-Finance Divide: Use of Customer Voice in Managerial Decision-Making. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. (2022) 25(3):361-382. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-09-2020-0113

[11] Chen Y, Xu J, Guo L, et al. Decision Tree-Based Classification in Coastal Area Integrating Polarimetric SAR and optical data. Data Technologies and Applications. (2022) 56(3):342-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-08-2019-0149

[12] Wijayati D T, Rahman M F W, Rahman Z, et al. A Study of Artificial Intelligence on Employee Performance and Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Change Leadership. International Journal of Manpower. (2022) 43(2):486-512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2021-0423

[13] Zuo M, Ma D. Unconscious or Conscious? The Impacts of Habit and Social Support Receipt on Older Adults' Continued Participation in Online Health Communities. Aslib Journal of Information Management. (2022) 74(4):688-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2021-0223

[14] Karimi T, Yahyazade Y. Developing a Risk Assessment Model for Banking Software Development Projects Based On Rough-Grey Set Theory. Grey Systems: Theory and Application. (2022) 12(3):574-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-05-2021-0074

[15] Ishizaka A, Prikshat V, Patel P, et al. A Multi-Stakeholder Ethical Framework for AI-Augmented HRM. International Journal of Manpower. (2022) 43(1):226-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0118

[16] Hajiagha S H R, Alaei S , Mahdiraji H A , et al. International Collaboration Formation in Entrepreneurial Food Industry: Evidence of an Emerging Economy. British Food Journal. (2022) 124(7):2012-2038. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0884

[17] Ismail Z A. Exploring E-Complaint Method: Learning From the Malaysian Polytechnic Institutions. Journal of Facilities Management. (2022) 20(3):501-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-01-2021-0014

[18] Bae S Y, Shin J S, Kim Y S, et al. Decision tree analysis on the performance of zeolite-based SCR catalysts. IFAC-PapersOnLine. (2021) 54(3):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.218