With the continuous crossover and integration of information technology and ecological station construction, forestry ecological stations have been improved in monitoring technology and instrumentation, laying a solid foundation for ecological benefit assessment, ecological early warning and ecological strategic decision analysis, which are of great importance for accelerating long-term positioning research and building green ecology. The purpose of this paper is to study the nature protection environment of forestry ecology based on Internet+. Based on some forestry ecological station data, the system is designed and implemented to help ecological station staff improve the efficiency of statistical analysis and visual display of monitoring data, historical data query and real-time understanding of changes in station conditions, etc. The forest area algorithm is proposed to achieve image compression and loading, and the experimental results show that the "Internet+ ecological station "management system can effectively realize the natural protection environment of forestry ecology.

Xiaolong Zhang. Nature Conservation Environment Based on Forestry Ecology in the Context of Internet+ . Nature Environmental Protection (2022), Vol. 3, Issue 2: 50-57. https://doi.org/10.38007/NEP.2022.030206.

[1] Guillermo Vega-Gorgojo, José M Giménez-García, Cristóbal Ordóñez, Felipe Bravo. Pioneering Easy-To-Use Forestry Data with Forest Explorer. Semantic Web. (2022) 13(2): 147-162. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-210430

[2] Andreas Beckmann, Uthayasankar Sivarajah, Zahir Irani. Circular Economy Versus Planetary Limits: A Slovak Forestry Sector Case Study. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. (2021) 34(6): 1673-1698. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2020-0110

[3] Antonio Alonso-Ayuso, Laureano F Escudero, Monique Guignard, Andrés Weintraub. Risk Management for Forestry Planning under Uncertainty in Demand and Prices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2018) 267(3): 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.022

[4] Heikki Hyyti, Ville V Lehtola, Arto Visala. Forestry Crane Posture Estimation with A Two-Dimensional Laser Scanner. J. Field Robotics. (2018) 35(7): 1025-1049. https://do i.org/10.1002/rob.21793

[5] Kazuo Ishii, Eiji Hayashi, Norhisam Bin Misron, Blair Thornton. Editorial: Advanced Robotics in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. J. Robotics Mechatronics. (2018) 30(2): 163-164. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2018.p0163

[6] Francesco Saverio Tortoriello, Ilaria Veronesi. Internet of Things to Protect the Environment: A Technological Transdisciplinary Project to Develop Mathematics with Ethical Effects. Soft Comput. (2021) 25(13): 8159-8168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05737-x

[7] Mohammed Amine Yagoub, Okba Kazar, Mounir Beggas. A Multi-Agent System Approach Based on Cryptographic Algorithm for Securing Communications and Protecting Stored Data in the Cloud-Computing Environment. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Secur. (2019) 11(4/5): 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICS.2019.101931

[8] Sake Madhu, Ranjit Midde, Gandikota Ramu, Appawala Jayanthi, Jalari Somasekar, Gajula Ramesh, Pallela Reddy. A Secured Framework to Protect Association Rules in the Big Data Environment Using Fuzzy Logic. Ingénierie des Systèmes d Inf. (2019) 24(5): 531-537. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.240511

[9] David J Arnold, Dayne Fernandez, Ruizhe Jia, Christian Parkinson, Deborah Tonne, Yotam Yaniv, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Stanley J Osher. Modeling Environmental Crime in Protected Areas Using the Level Set Method. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (2019) 79(3): 802-821. https://doi.org/10. 1137/18M1205339

[10] Marina Malamud Environmental Ethics in the Military: Between Warfare and Ecosystem Protection. Int. J. Technoethics. (2018) 9(2): 51-61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.2018070105

[11] Steve Mansfield-Devine. The Intelligent Way to Protect Complex Environments. Netw. Secur. (2018) 2018(5): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(18)30045-X

[12] Amit P. Sheth, Hong Yung Yip, Saeedeh Shekarpour. Extending Patient-Chatbot Experience with Internet-of-Things and Background Knowledge: Case Studies with Healthcare Applications. IEEE Intell. Syst. (2019) 34(4): 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2019.2905748

[13] Anique J Scheerder, Alexander J A M van Deursen, Jan A G M van Dijk. Negative Outcomes of Internet Use: A Qualitative Analysis in the Homes of Families with Different Educational Backgrounds. Inf. Soc. (2019) 35(5): 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1649774

[14] D Radha, M G Kavitha. Deep Learning Enabled Privacy Preserving Techniques for Intrusion Detection Systems in the Industrial Internet of Things. Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks. (2022) 52(3-4): 223-247.

[15] Neda Mehdizadeh, Nazbanoo Farzaneh. An Evidence Theory based Approach in Detecting Malicious Controller in the Multi-Controller Software-defined Internet of Things Network. Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks. (2022) 51(4): 235-260.

[16] Fulvio Corno, Luigi De Russis, Alberto Monge Roffarello. How do End-Users Program the Internet of Things? Behav. Inf. Technol. (2022) 41(9): 1865-1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492 9X.2022.2071169

[17] Jina Kim, Eunil Park. Understanding Social Resistance to Determine the Future of Internet of Things (IoT) services. Behav. Inf. Technol. (2022) 41(3): 547-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0144929X.2020.1827033

[18] Alaa Omran Almagrabi, Rashid Ali, Daniyal M Alghazzawi, Abdullah Albarakati, Tahir Khurshaid. A Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework for Crowdsourcing in Massive Health Care Internet of Things. Big Data. (2022) 10(2): 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2021.0058