With the rapid development of China's economy, environmental protection (EP) has attracted much attention. The geological environment management in mining areas is one of the important elements, however, the effectiveness of geological environment management in many mining areas is far from the national standard. Therefore, this paper takes mining geological EP as an example, establishes an evaluation system to assess the geology of mining areas, and calculates the index weights of the system by fuzzy mathematical algorithm (FMA), and analyzes the current situation of mining geology from multiple levels, such as greening coverage rate, land reclamation rate, and land planning and management, in order to propose strategies to protect the geological environment of mining areas. The results show that the geological EP of mining areas can be realized only from scientific exploitation of mineral resources, control of water resources utilization of mining activities, and construction of green mining areas.

Shania Pesik. Building an Environmental Protection Assessment System Based on Fuzzy Mathematical Algorithm. Nature Environmental Protection (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 2: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.38007/NEP.2020.010201.

[1] Mahdi A, Siamak T. Improved Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Design Optimization of Fuzzy Controllers in Steel Building Structures with Nonlinear Behavior Considering Near Fault Ground Motion Effects. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2020) 55(5): 4041-4075. 

[2] Cuong T, Bao H, Moazam B, Amir M R, Mehdi H, Mohammad M. Optimized Fuzzy Clustering Using Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm in wireless Sensor Networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2020) 55(3): 1915-1945. 

[3] Tobias E, Martin P, Doreen T. Automation of Maritime Shipping for More Safety and EP. Autom. (2020) 70(5): 406-410. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2020-0003

[4] Simona P, Pedro S A, Daniel P M. A Discriminant Analysis of High and Low-Innovative Firms: The Role of IT, Human Resources, Innovation Strategy, Intellectual Capital and Environmental Dynamism. J. Knowl. Manag. (2020) 26 (6): 1615-1632. 

[5] Mikaeel A , Mohammed E. L, Ryuto S, Abdul M H, Tomonobu S. Optimal Sizing of Multiple Renewable Energy Resources and PV Inverter Reactive Power Control Encompassing Environmental, Technical, and Economic Issues. IEEE Syst. J. (2019) 13 (3): 3026-3037. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2918185

[6] Kurt V, Chandrani B, Fabio M, Jon W. Teaching Algebraic Model Construction: A Tutoring System, Lessons Learned and an Evaluation. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (2020) 30(3): 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00205-3

[7] Srecko S, Nenad J, Pinaki C. Evaluation of Simulation Systems Suitable For Teaching Compiler Construction Courses. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. (2020) 28(3): 606-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22231

[8] Akihisa O, Andante H P, Daiki Y, Hiroshi O. Environmental and Economic Evaluation of a Mechanical Biological Treatment System for a Small and Medium-Sized Waste Treatment Facility Considering the Karatsu Smart Disaster-Resilience Base Construction Project. Int. J. Autom. Technol. (2020) 14(6): 984-998. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2020.p0984

[9] Dacheng X, Theodore S. R. Construction on Teaching Evaluation Index System of Track And Field General Course for Physical Education Major in Light of Wireless Network Technology. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. (2019) 37(3): 3435-3443. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179147

[10] Utsav P, Sanjeet S. Data Envelopment Analysis in Hierarchical Category Structure with Fuzzy Boundaries. Ann. Oper. Res. (2020) 315(2): 1517-1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03854-8

[11] Thara A, Jitimon A. FLORA: A Hierarchical Fuzzy System for Online Accommodation Review Analysis. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. (2019) 21(3): 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-03-2018-0046

[12] Laura A, Ruo C L, Rajiv K, Hejamadi R Rao. Effects of Structural and Trait Competitiveness Stimulated by Points and Leaderboards on User Engagement and Performance Growth: A Natural Experiment with Gamification in an Informal Learning Environment. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2020) 29(6): 704-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808540

[13] Yuta Y, Kenji T, Tadashi W, Toshitake T. Durability Evaluation of an Additive Manufactured Biodegradable Composite with Continuous Natural Fiber in Various Conditions Reproducing Usage Environment. Int. J. Autom. Technol. (2020) 14(6): 959-965. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2020.p0959

[14] Ali A, Roger S, Roozbeh J, Bobak J. M. Using Intelligent Personal Annotations to Improve Human Activity Recognition for Movements in Natural Environments. IEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics (2020) 24(9): 2639-2650. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.2966151

[15] Gabor K, Yasuharu K, Takao M, Hideki H. Saliency and Spatial Information-Based Landmark Selection for Mobile Robot Navigation in Natural Environments. Adv. Robotics (2019) 33(10): 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2019.1602564

[16] Alice C, Andrea G. When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Virtual and Natural Environments. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. (2019) 22(3): 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0393

[17] Euisung J, Eun J J. Service-Oriented Architecture of Environmental Information Systems to Forecast the Impacts of Natural Disasters in South Korea. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. (2015) 32 (1): 16-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2015-0022

[18] Dina K, Suzan A, Birsen D, Martina R, Joyita C. Using Naturalistic Vehicle-Based Data to Predict Distraction and Environmental Demand. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2019) 11(3): 59-70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2019070104