Academic Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 3(4); doi: 10.38007/AJAS.2022.030407.
Xiang Zeng
Nanjing University of Vocational Industry Technology, Nanjing, China
Different Proterozoic have different applications in physiological mechanisms of plant stress. Plant proteins have strong responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt stress, low temperature, and anaerobic stress, as well as biological stresses such as pests, bacteria, and fungal infections. Mechanism, with different effects in different physiological mechanisms. The purpose of this article is to better understand the damage mechanism of plants after being stressed. By studying the adaptation and defense mechanisms of plants to the environment, this article uses genetic algorithms to conduct proteomics research on differential proteomics, analyze their differences, and Experimental analysis of the growth mechanism of plants in adversity. Use mathematical analysis and mathematical statistics to statistically classify the data. Use big data to fit the data. Then, through different protein composition, the physiological mechanism of plant stress Research experiments analyze the different effects. The experimental data show that in the more adverse environment, the stronger the plant's self-protection, the more proteins transcribed to adapt to the adverse environment. The experimental results show that different protein compositions play a pivotal role in the physiological mechanism of plant stress. The use of proteins has a protective effect on the plant's adversity. The research results have been applied to the growth of plants, which has increased the growth rate of plant colors by about 15%. It laid a solid foundation for future research on physiological mechanisms of adversity.
Differential Proteomics, Plant Stress Growth Mechanism, Active Natural Products, Defense Mechanism
Xiang Zeng. The Physiological Mechanism of Plant Stress Based on Different Protein Composition. Academic Journal of Agricultural Sciences (2022), Vol. 3, Issue 4: 89-103. https://doi.org/10.38007/AJAS.2022.030407.
[1] Intharawijitr K, Iida K, Koga H. Simulation study of low latency network architecture using mobile edge computing. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 2017, 100(5): 963-972.
[2] Al-Shqeerat H A K, Al-Shrouf M A F, Hassan M R, . Cloud computing security challenges in higher educational institutions-A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 161(6): 22-29.
[3] Khan S, Parkinson S, Qin Y. Fog computing security: a review of current applications and security solutions. Journal of Cloud Computing, 2017, 6(1): 19.
[4] Sarkar M, Banerjee S, Badr Y. Configuring a trusted cloud service model for smart city exploration using hybrid intelligence. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 2017, 8(3): 1-21.
[5] Hu P, Ning H, Qiu T, . Fog computing based face identification and resolution scheme in internet of things. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2016, 13(4): 1910-1920.
[6] Menon V G, Prathap P M J. Moving from vehicular cloud computing to vehicular fog computing: Issues and challenges. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2017, 9(2): 14-18.
[7] Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero R S, Huedo E, . Cross-site virtual network in cloud and fog computing. IEEE Cloud Computing, 2017, 4(2): 46-53.
[8] Yu Feng, Mao Zhizhong, Jia Mingxing. Recursive identification for Hammerstein-Wiener systems with dead-zone input nonlinearity. Journal of Process Control,2018,23(8):1108-1115.
[9] Wang Xuehai, Ding Feng. Modelling and multi-innovation parameter identification for Hammerstein nonlinear state space systems using the filtering technique. Mathematical & Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems,2016,22(2):113-140.
[10] Gao Xuehui, Ren Xuemei, Zhu Changsheng .Identification and control for Hammerstein systems with hysteresis non-linearity. IET Control Theory & Applications,2017,9(13):1935-1947.
[11] Bhandari N, Rollins D. Continuous-time Hammerstein nonlinear modeling applied to distillation. AIChE Journal,2018,50(2):530-533.
[12] Wang Qingchao, Zhang Jianzhong. Nonlinear predictive control for continuous stirred-tank reactor using Hammerstein model. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology,2016,34(5):618-623.
[13] Ma Xinying, Shi Huafeng, Su Chengli. Predictive control algorithm based on fuzzy Hammerstein model and its application to pH process. Computers & Applied Chemistry,2018,30(10):1122-1126.
[14] Veen G, Wingerden J W, Verhaegen M. Global identification of wind turbines using a Hammerstein identification method. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,2016,21(4):1471-1478.
[15] Huo Haibo, Zhu Xinjian, Hu Wanqi. Nonlinear model predictive control of SOFC based on a Hammerstein model. Journal of Power Sources,2018,185(1):338-344.
[16] Filipovic V Z. Consistency of the robust recursive Hammerstein model identification algorithm. Journal of the Franklin Institute,2017,352(5):1932-1945.
[17] Wang Jiandong, Zhang Qinghua, Ljung L. Revisiting Hammerstein system identification through the two-stage algorithm for bilinear parameter estimation.Automatica,2019,45(11):2627-2633.
[18] Ding Feng, Shi Yang, Chen Tongwen. Gradient-based identification methods for Hammerstein nonlinear ARMAX models. Nonlinear Dynamics,2017,45(1-2):31-43.
[19] Ma Liang, Liu Xinggao. Recursive maximum likelihood method for the identification of Hammerstein ARMAX system. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2016,40(13-14):6523-6535.
[20] Ding Feng, Deng Kepo, Liu Ximei. Decomposition based Newton iterative identification method for a Hammerstein nonlinear FIR system with ARMA noise. Circuits Systems & Signal Processing,2018,33(9):2881-2893.
[21] Wang Cheng, Tang Tao. Several gradient-based iterative estimation algorithms for a class of nonlinear systems using the filtering technique. Nonlinear Dynamics,2018,77(3):769-780.
[22] Li Meihang, Liu Ximei, Ding Feng. The maximum likelihood least squares based iterative estimation algorithm for bilinear systems with autoregressive moving average noise. Journal of the Franklin Institute,2017,354(12):4861-4881.
[23] Bai Erwei, Li Kang. Convergence of the iterative algorithm for a general Hammerstein system identifi-cation.Automatica,2018,46(11):1891-1896.
[24] Bai Erwei, Fu Minyue. A blind approach to Hammerstein model identification. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,2019,50(7):1610-1619.
[25] Wang Jiandong, Sano A, Chen Tongwen. Identification of Hammerstein systems without explicit parameterisation of non-linearity. International Journal of Control,2019,82(5):937-952.