Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Nature Environmental Protection, 2023, 4(2); doi: 10.38007/NEP.2023.040204.

Evaluation of Tourism Environmental Carrying Capacity of Natural Environment Area Based on Artificial Intelligence


Leinninger Gina

Corresponding Author:
Leinninger Gina

Univ Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya


With the rapid development of the economy, the tourism industry has been rapidly promoted, and the environmental pollution problems caused by the serious overloading of tourists have emerged in various tourist areas. Although it has effectively improved the development speed of tourism economy, it is not conducive to the ecological stability of local tourism areas. The sustainable economic growth of tourism needs to analyze the scenic resources and calculate the Carrying Capacity (CC) of the scenic resources. This refers to the level of tourism activities that can be supported by a specific tourism destination. The number of tourists that can be accommodated in the scenic spot can be estimated by investigating the environmental CC of the natural scenic spot, so as to ensure that the tourism development would not damage the environment of the scenic spot. The traditional analysis of Tourism Environmental Carrying Capacity (TECC) is based on artificial analysis indicators, which leads to inaccurate analysis of the environmental CC of tourism areas. With the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, this paper applied AI technology to the analysis of TECC of natural environment areas. This paper compared the traditional analysis of TECC with the analysis of TECC based on AI technology. The accuracy of the analysis of the TECC of the traditional natural environment area was the highest of 86.8%, and the accuracy of the analysis of the TECC of the natural environment area based on AI was the highest of 94.2%. Therefore, the application of AI technology to comprehensive analysis of various resource indicators of scenic spots could effectively improve the accuracy of environmental CC analysis of scenic spots.


Tourism Environmental Carrying Capacity, Natural Environment Area, Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Neural Network

Cite This Paper

Leinninger Gina. Evaluation of Tourism Environmental Carrying Capacity of Natural Environment Area Based on Artificial Intelligence. Nature Environmental Protection (2023), Vol. 4, Issue 2: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.38007/NEP.2023.040204.


[1] Butler Richard William. Tourism carrying capacity research: a perspective article. Tourism Review. (2020) 75(1): 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-05-2019-0194

[2] Ruimin Li. Geological resources and environmental carrying capacity evaluation review, theory, and practice in China. China Geology. (2018) 1(4): 556-565. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2018050

[3] Muler Gonzalez, Vanessa Lluis Coromina, Nuria Gali. Overtourism: residents' perceptions of tourism impact as an indicator of resident social carrying capacity-case study of a Spanish heritage town. Tourism review. (2018) 73(3): 277-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-08-2017-0138

[4] Zhenrao Cai. Joint development of cultural heritage protection and tourism: the case of Mount Lushan cultural landscape heritage site. Heritage Science. (2021) 9(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00558-5

[5] Sati Vishwambhar Prasad. Carrying capacity analysis and destination development: a case study of Gangotri tourists/pilgrims' circuit in the Himalaya. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. (2018) 23(3): 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1433220

[6] Holden Andrew. Environmental ethics for tourism-the state of the art. Tourism Review. (2019) 74(3): 694-703. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2017-0066

[7] Milano Claudio, Marina Novelli, Joseph M. Cheer. Overtourism and tourismphobia: A journey through four decades of tourism development, planning and local concerns. Tourism Planning & Development. (2019) 16(4): 353-357.

[8] Benner Maximilian. From overtourism to sustainability: A research agenda for qualitative tourism development in the Adriatic. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie= German Journal of Economic Geography. (2019) 2(64): 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2019-0016

[9] Kia Zakia. Ecotourism in Indonesia: Local community involvement and the affecting factors. Journal of Governance and Public Policy. (2021) 8(2): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v8i2.10789

[10] Dzhandzhugazova Elena A. Ecotourism development in Russia: analysis of best regional practices. Ekoloji. (2019) 28(107): 411-415.

[11] Ho William, Xin Ma. The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. (2018) 267(2): 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007

[12] Darko Amos. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International journal of construction management. (2019) 19(5): 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452098

[13] Kaul Vivek, Sarah Enslin, Seth A. Gross. History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. (2020) 92(4): 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040

[14] Bo Zhang, Jun Zhu, Hang Su. Toward the third generation artificial intelligence. Science China Information Sciences.  (2023) 66(2): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3449-x

[15] Guangyu Yang, Robert, Xiaojing Wang. Artificial neural networks for neuroscientists: a primer. Neuron. (2020) 107(6): 1048-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.005