As essentially a public information space, the Internet provides new ways of public management and channels for the public to express their opinions. With features of being trans-national and cross-territorial, and specialties of pluralism, openness and public welfare, the cyberspace provides fertile ground for the public to participate in public life and cultivate public rationality, enriches the value connotation of national publicness, and provides the possibility for the development and improvement of national publicness.

Xu Zhang. New Development of National Publicity in the Internet Era. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Management (2023), Vol. 4, Issue 2: 11-19. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJSSEM.2023.040202.

[1] Wang Yingbo, Lu Chuanying. (2022) The emergence of global order in cyberspace and China's contribution. Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, 29 (02): 65-78. DOI: 10.16060/j.cnki.issn2095-807.2022.02.005

[2] Zhang Peng, Zhao Ying. (2021) Rise, review and optimization of civil service reform in the Internet era. Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 22 (01): 56-68

[3] Xu Kaiyi. (2022) On the construction of international discourse power in China's cyberspace. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), (04): 116-127

[4] Liu Shun. (2022)  The ideological tendency of network populism and its clarification. Ideological and Theoretical Education, (09): 88-93. DOI: 10.16075/j.cnki.cn31-1220/g4.2022.09.001

[5] Hao Long. (2020) Will the Internet be an effective force to save the "decline of citizen participation" - disputes and differences since the 1990s E-Government, (6): 107 - 120

[6] Chen Quan, Zhang Qing. (2022) Improving citizens' digital literacy and cultivating qualified digital citizens-developing and explaining the Digital Citizenship Assessment Scale. Journal of Jiangsu University (Social Science Edition), 24 (06): 116-127.DOI: 10.13317/j.cnki.jdskxb.2022.62

[7] Zhao Zhiyun, (2021) Cyberspace Governance - Global Progress and China's Practice, Social Science Literature Press, March, page 3.

[8] Reference Lin Ke and He Yuanyuan. (2022) Experience and enlightenment of American common sense organization "digital citizenship" course. Afterschool Education In China, (05): 98-111]

[9] Chen Xing. (2022) On the theoretical basis of cyberspace sovereignty and China's plan. Gansu Social Sciences, (03): 113-121. DOI: 10.15891/j.cnki.cn62-1093/c.2022.03.015

[10] Chen Xi. (2022) Building a community with a shared future in cyberspace and protecting users' basic rights . Shandong Social Sciences, (12): 163-169. doi: 10.14112/j.cnki.37-1053/c.2022.12.019

[11] Liu Guozhu. (2022) "Digital authoritarianism" theory and competition between great powers in the digital age. American Studies, 36 (02): 35-57+6

[12] Michael Quint, Gu Haiyan. (2022) Digital colonialism: American empire and new imperialism in the global south. Foreign Theoretical Dynamics, (03): 112-122

[13] Yan Guohua, He Zhen. (2022) Publicity and anti-publicity: paradox and solution of public participation in cyberspace. Theory and Reform, (06): 133-146+161. DOI: 10.13553/j.cnki.lygg.2022.06.010

[14] Wang Jiafeng, Li Menghan. (2022) The paradox of the publicity of online public opinion. Tianjin Social Sciences, (06): 38-44+148. DOI: 10.16240/j.cnki.1002-3976.20022.06.008

[15] Feng Jianjun, Yan Yuru. (2022) Reorienting online civic education in the virtual public sphere. Education theory and practice, 42 (31): 27-34

[16] Tang Zhiwei, Ye Changxiu. (2022) The digital usage gap and citizens' political participation: an empirical analysis with political efficacy as an intermediary variable. Journal of Intelligence , 41 (09): 129-135+111

[17] Chen Jiagang. (2022) Digital consultative democracy: cognitive frontier, administrative value and practice space. Chinese Public Administration, (01): 26-32.DOI: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2022.01.04

[18] Zheng Zhihang. (2023) The theoretical proof of digital human rights and the meaning of autonomy. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 26 (01): 35-47