Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Sports Technology, 2024, 5(1); doi: 10.38007/IJST.2024.050101.

Research Engagement and Productivity of Physical Education Teachers: Basis for Quality Research Management in Universities

Author(s)

Yongsheng Liao, Mark Christian Siwa

Corresponding Author:
Mark Christian Siwa
Affiliation(s)

Adamson University, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

This descriptive correlational study focused on the research engagement and productivity of the physical education teachers in selected universities in China. Physical Education teacher-respondents are productive in research as institutional requirement, performance evaluation, and professional title evaluation which are often important to research engagement. Therefore, they engage in research because it is a university requirement for their performance evaluation so they can obtain the highest professional title. Physical Education teacher-respondents are less productive in research completion since it would be possible only at a specified duration. They are productive in research publication and utilization which are often important to research productivity. However, they neither consider important the publication in high-quality Chinese journals in physical education and based on international standards nor international peer-review processes in physical education. All the variables in research engagement such as institutional requirements, performance evaluation and professional title evaluation are positively correlated to all the variables in research productivity such as research completion, research publication, research presentation and research utilization. It indicates that the Physical Education teacher-respondents who considered more the factors in research engagement such as institutional requirements, performance evaluation and professional title evaluation also considered more research productivity in terms of research completion, research publication, research presentation and research utilization. It also indicates that the research productivity of the Physical Education teacher-respondents had something to do with the factors in research engagement. 

Keywords

Research Engagement and Productivity, Quality Research Management, Descriptive Correlational, Research Productivity

Cite This Paper

Yongsheng Liao, Mark Christian Siwa. Research Engagement and Productivity of Physical Education Teachers: Basis for Quality Research Management in Universities. International Journal of Sports Technology (2024), Vol. 5, Issue 1: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJST.2024.050101.

References

[1] Gong, Y., MacPhail, A., and Guberman, A. (2021). Professional learning and development needs of Chinese university-based physical education teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education. doi:10.1080/02619768.2021.1892638. 

[2] Van Der Klink, M., et al. (2017). Professional development of teacher educators: what do they do? Findings from an explorative international study. Professional Development in Education, 43 (2), 163–178. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1114506. 

[3] MacPhail, A., et al. (2019). The professional development of higher education-based teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional Development in Education, 45 (5), 848–861. doi:10.1080/19415257.2018.1529610.

[4] Aithal, S. (2016): How to Increase Research Productivity in Higher Educational Institutions –SIMS Model. Published in: International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Education (IJSRME) ISSN (Online): 2455 – 5630. Vol. 01, No. 01 (3 June 2016): pp. 447-458.

[5] Roberts,A.and Weston, K., 2014. Releasing the hidden academic? Learning from teacher-educators’ responses to a writing support programme. Professional Development in Education, 40 (5), 698–716. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.835277. 

[6] Xuehui, A.(2008) “Teacher Career Development and Teaching Incentives in Rural China.” Beijing Normal University Journal (Social Science Edition) 2008 (3/207):117-122 (in Chinese). https://repository.upenn.edu/gansu_papers/19/

[7] Zhu, H.(2010). Curriculum reform and professional development: a case study on Chinese teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 36 (1–2), 373–391. doi:10.1080/19415250903457604.

[8] Zhang, L.and Sivertsen, G. (2020). The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1), p.3. DOI: http://doi.org/10.29024/sar.15

[9] Karachiwalla, N. & Park, A. (2015). Promotion incentives in the public sector: Evidence from Chinese Schoolshttps://iems.ust.hk/assets/publications/working-papers-2015/iemswp2015-09_rev.pdf

[10]Ka-Ho Mok, J.& Xiong, W. (2021). China and Higher Education Conference: Responding to a Changing World - Does International Higher Education Still Matter?

Retrieved from https://www.ln.edu.hk/sgs/china-and-higher-education-conference-2021

[11]Han, S. & Xie, J. (2020). How COVID has changed China’s approach to research evaluation? Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2021120813365868

[12]Juneja,P.(2022).The Expectancy Theory of Motivation. Retrieved from https://www.managementstudyguide.com/expectancy-theory-motivation.html