Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Business Management and Economics and Trade, 2024, 5(1); doi: 10.38007/IJBMET.2024.050109.

The Specific Information of Key Audit Matters and Equity Risk in China: Mechanism Analysis Based on Implied Equity Duration

Author(s)

Zixuan Zhang, Zhijie Xu, Muzhi Wang

Corresponding Author:
Muzhi Wang
Affiliation(s)

School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China


Abstract

This paper applies the method of text analysis to measure the proportion of the specific information of key audit matters in audit reports of listed companies in China. We find that after the beginning of the new audit report reform in China, the proportion of the specific information in the key audit matter of the audit report has a positive association with the proportion of equity idiosyncratic risk in total risk and a negative association with the proportion of equity systematic risk in total risk in the audit report year. The specific information of the key audit matter will increase the proportion of equity idiosyncratic risk in total risk and reduce the proportion of equity systematic risk in total risk in the next year of the audit report year. We also carry out the mechanism test through the implied equity duration model. The results show that (1) the common mechanism for associations between the proportion of the specific information of the key audit matter and each of equity idiosyncratic and systematic risks in the audit report year is the association between the proportion of the specific information and the basic operating and financial features (the ratio of the implied equity duration to the cost of equity capital) of the company in the audit report year. This confirms the reliability of the content of key audit matters based on the company's operating and financial conditions. (2) The influencing mechanisms of the proportion of the specific information of the key audit matter in the audit report on equity idiosyncratic and systematic risks in the next year of the audit report year are the influences of the specific information proportion on market perceptions of equity idiosyncratic and systematic risks (the volatility of the company-level change of expected return and the sensitivity of the market-level change of expected return respectively) in the next year. This shows that key audit matters provide incremental information to the decision-making of investors in the security market. In conclusion, the implementation of the new audit report reform in China plays an important role in promoting the high-quality development of the security market.

Keywords

Key Audit Matters, Specific Information Proportion, Implied Equity Duration, Idiosyncratic Risk, Systematic Risk

Cite This Paper

Zixuan Zhang, Zhijie Xu, Muzhi Wang. The Specific Information of Key Audit Matters and Equity Risk in China: Mechanism Analysis Based on Implied Equity Duration. International Journal of Business Management and Economics and Trade (2024), Vol. 5, Issue 1: 72-90. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJBMET.2024.050109.

References

[1] Qian Sai, Yanxi Li, Yanwen Liu, Heng Zhao, Shanshan Ouyang. (2022). Audit report information improvement and earnings management. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 1-18. 

[2] Yanyan Wang et al. (2018). Can Key Audit Matters Enhance the Communication Value of the Audit Report?. Accounting Research, 2018(6):86-93

[3] Barigozzi M, Brownlees C, Gallo G M, et al. (2014). Disentangling systematic and idiosyncratic dynamics in panels of volatility measures. Journal of Econometrics, 18: 364-384. 

[4] Abdoh H, Varela O. Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2017, 43: 500-513. 

[5] Fengming Song, Jie Jiang. (2003). An Empirical Study of the Volatility Characteristics of the Chinese Stock Market. Journal of Financial Research, 2003(4): 13-22

[6] Ling Tao, Ying Zhu. (2016). On China’s Financial Systemic Risks. Journal of Financial Research, 2016(06): 18-36

[7] Bo Huang, Zhan Li, Mengdi Gu. (2006). A Study of Firm Idiosyncratic Risk Based On Risk Appetite Asset Pricing Models. Management World, 2006(11): 119-127

[8] Bennett J A, Sias R W, Starks L T. (2003). Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences. Review of Financial Studies, 16: 1203-1238. 

[9] Weiqi Liu, Xinxin Liu. (2014). Individual/institutional investor sentiment and stock returns: Study based onShanghai A-share market. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2014, 17(3): 70-87

[10] Beyer, A, Cohen, D. A, Lys, T. Z, & Walther, B. R. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296-343. 

[11] Kothari, S. P, Li, X, & Short, J. E. (2009). The effect of disclosures by management, analysts, and business press on cost of capital, return volatility, and analyst forecasts: A study using content analysis. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1639-1670. 

[12] Jin, L, & Myers, S. C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257-292. 

[13] Jianbo Song, Xiaoqing Feng. (2022). The Information Content of Critical Audit Matters and Corporate Bond Issue Pricing——Evidence from Text Similarity. Accounting Research, 2022(03): 174-191

[14] Muzhi Wang, Dan Li. (2019). New Audit Reporting and Stock Price Synchronicity. Accounting Research, 2019(1): 86-92

[15] Dechow, P. M, Sloan, R. G. & Soliman, M. T. (2004). Implied Equity Duration: A New Measure of Equity Risk. Review of Accounting Studies 9, 197-228

[16] Campbell, J. and J. Mei. (1993). Where Do Beta Come From? Asset Price Dynamics and the Sources of Systematic Risk. The Review of Financial Studies 6, 567-592. 

[17] Cornell, B. (1999). Risk, Duration, and Capital Budgeting: New Evidence on Some Old Questions. Journal of Business 72, 183-200.