With the socialism with Chinese characteristics entering a new era, the wealth gap between urban and rural areas is still large, the rural development lags behind, and the development of animal husbandry is insufficient. Therefore, the government must vigorously implement the strategy of Rural Revitalization. Based on the above background, the main purpose of this paper is to analyze the international development trend of animal husbandry and breeding characteristic industry under the background of Rural Revitalization. Based on the development of animal husbandry in this town from 2013 to 2018, this paper analyzes the development status and development trend of animal husbandry in the world, analyzes the macro environment and situation of animal husbandry development in this township, and mainly establishes the evaluation model of ecological animal husbandry by using sustainable environmental assessment method. The experimental results show that: there is little difference between the simulation value and the actual value of the number of livestock products in the township. The maximum error rate between the simulation value and the realized value is 2.7%, the minimum error rate is 0.8%, and the average error is 1.2%. It fully shows that the simulation model of animal husbandry eco-economic development system in the township has a good fitting degree, and describes the actual development of the Township animal husbandry eco-economic system. The international development trend of Township animal husbandry, first of all, we should ensure the new connotation of animal husbandry product safety, that is, quality safety and quantity safety. The Township animal husbandry products should develop in the direction of high-grade, characteristic and flavor. In terms of the regional layout of animal husbandry production, it is planned to divide into three areas: controlled breeding area, moderate breeding area and developmental breeding area.

Yan Fan. International Development Trend of Animal Husbandry and Breeding Industry under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Academic Journal of Agricultural Sciences (2021), Vol. 2, Issue. 1: 10-23. https://doi.org/10.38007/AJAS.2021.020102.

[1] Gan l, Hu x. The Pollutants from Livestock and Poultry Farming in China—Geographic Distribution and Drivers. Environ, Pollut Res Int, 2016, 23(9):8470-8483. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6075-9

[2] Tao L. development of circular economy of characteristic breeding industry in Guangxi. Agricultural research in Asia: English version, 2016, 000 (007): p.28-32.

[3] Gonin m. Adam Smith's Contribution to Business Ethics, Then and Now. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 129(1):1-16.

[4] Jose d j r, Elias i, Ricardo Cruz d, Et Al. Uniform Stable Radial Basis Function Neural Network for the Prediction in Two Mechatronic Processes. Neurocomputing, 2016, 227(Mar.1):122-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.109

[5] Pedro m. Lourenço, Piersma t. Migration Distance and Breeding Latitude Correlate With the Scheduling of Pre-Alternate Body Moult: a Comparison Among Migratory Waders. Journal of Ornithology, 2016, 156(3):1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1175-8

[6] Trojak-Goluch a, Laskowska d, Kursa k. Morphological and Chemical Characteristics of Doubled Haploids of Flue-Cured Tobacco Combining Resistance to Thielaviopsis Basicola And Tswv. Breed, 2016, 66(2):293-299.

[7] Post t, Fang y, Kopa m. Linear Tests for Decreasing Absolute Risk Aversion Stochastic Dominance. Management Ence, 2015, 61(7):Págs. 1615-1629.

[8] Khayatzadeh n, Mészáros, g, Utsunomiya y t, Et Al. Effects of Breed Proportion And Components of Heterosis for Semen Traits in a Composite Cattle Breed. Journal of Animal Breeding & Genetics, 2017, 135(1):45-53. DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12304

[9] Fuerst c, James j w, Slkner j, Et Al. Impact of Dominance and Epistasis on the Genetic Make-Up of Simulated Populations under Selection: a Model Development. Journal of Animal Breeding & Genetics, 2015, 114(1-6):163-175.

[10] Hill w g, m?Ki-Tanila a. Expected Influence of Linkage Disequilibrium on Genetic Variance Caused By Dominance and Epistasis on Quantitative Traits. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2015, 132(2):176-186.

[11] Gómez, f.a, Ballesteros l e. Evaluation of Coronary Dominance in Pigs; a Comparative Study with Findings in Human Hearts. Arquivo Brasilro De Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 2015, 67(3):783-789.

[12] Serenius t, Stalder k j, Puonti m. Impact of Dominance Effects on Sow Longevity. Journal of Animal Breeding & Genetics, 2015, 123(6):355-361.