At present, the world is facing increasingly severe environmental problems, and green finance is one of the important means to control environmental pollution. China proposes to realize "three to one, one to reduce, one to compensate" and give the economy a position to transform from high-speed growth to high-quality development, so that the understanding of the "green" development concept is continuously deepened in all sectors of society. The financial sector is an important pillar of modern economic development, and giving full play to its functions can effectively promote the development of China's green economy. Therefore, the traditional financial operating model must shift to green, environmentally friendly and sustainable finance. This article focuses on the obstacles to the implementation of environmental protection financial policies in China. This article is aimed at the Beihai Branch of the State Oceanic Administration as an experimental object. From this experiment, we can see that the sewage charges in 2013 were 6.740 billion Yuan, and in 2019, the sewage charges were 18.524 billion Yuan, an increase of nearly twice in absolute amount and an average growth rate of 18.71%. Through this experimental data analysis, the role of current financial support in the development of marine economy has long been valued by major coastal countries in the world. Based on the evaluation of the financial effects of China's marine environmental protection, explore solutions to improve the quality of the marine environment, enhance the carrying capacity of the marine environment, and promote the development of the marine financial industry; from the perspective of policy mix, construct regional capital flows for the coordinated development of the marine environment industry structure to promote the coordinated development of the marine environmental protection industry and marine finance industry. Effectively dock the government's systemic leading role and the market's resource allocation function; organically integrate fiscal and financial mechanisms.

Qingjun Wang. Obstacles to China's Implementation of Environmental Protection Financial Policies. Nature Environmental Protection (2021), Vol. 2, Issue. 1: 15-28. https://doi.org/10.38007/NEP.2021.020103.

[1] Sarah K. Valentine-Maher, Patricia G. Butterfield, Gary Laustsen. Environmental Health: Advancing Emancipatory Policies for the Common Good. Ans Adv Nurs Sci, 2017, 41(1):1. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000194

[2] Mohamed M. Mostafa, Mohaned Al-Hamdi. Kuwaiti consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental protection in Failaka Island: a contingent valuation analysis. Tourism Review, 2016, 71(3):219-233. DOI: 10.1108/TR-05-2016-0012

[3] Agnieszka Glowacka, Jaroslaw Taszakowski, Jaroslaw Janus. Environmental Protection Tools in Agricultural Management Works. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 44(4):042025.

[4] Mank B C. South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection: Will Section 1983 Save Title VI Disparate Impact Suits. 2015, 53(5):1-14.

[5] E.A.G. Geltman. Oil & gas drilling in national parks. Natural Resources Journal, 2016, 56(1):145-192.

[6] Jason Thistlethwaite, Daniel Henstra, Craig Brown. How Flood Experience and Risk Perception Influences Protective Actions and Behaviours among Canadian Homeowners. Environmental Management, 2017, 61(3–4):1-12.

[7] Ronen Israel, Aharon R. Ofer, Daniel R. Siegel. The Use of Changes in Equity Value as a Measure of the Information Content of Announcements of Changes in Financial Policy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2016, 8(2):209-216. DOI: 10.1080/07350015.1990.10509792

[8] Thinh An Nguyen, Dung Anh Vu, Phai Van Vu. Human ecological effects of tropical storms in the coastal area of Ky Anh (Ha Tinh, Vietnam). Environment Development & Sustainability, 2017, (2017)(19):745–767.

[9] Yi ZENG. Malthus’ population theory is still wrong. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2017, 62(21):2335-2345.

[10] Desiree Hellegers. The Rise of the American Conservation Movement: Power, Privilege and Environmental Protection by Dorceta E. Taylor (review). Canadian Journal of History, 2017, 52(3):609-611. DOI：10.3138/cjh.ach.52.3.rev22

[11] M R Tsibulnikova, S V Nadyumov, A M Adam. Resource conservation program in terms of Vostokgazprom environmental policy. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2016, 43(1):012041.

[12] Petrovićranđelović M V, Radukić S. THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC SYSTEM, ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. Adult Education in Finland, 2015, 18(2):153-62.

[13] Adam Wasilewski. Efficiency of EU financial support policy for development of rural entrepreneurship in Poland. Economics of Agriculture, 2015, 62(2):437-452. DOI: 10.5937/ekoPolj1502437W

[14] Patrick Thieffry. Environmental protection and European Union energy policy: Energy transition after the Paris Agreement. Era Forum, 2017, 17(4):1-17.

[15] Abdulrahman M El-Sayed, Sandro Galea. Calorie Offsets: Environmental Policy for the Food Environment. American Journal of Public Health, 2015, 105(8):e1-e3.

[16] Chan G. China's Compliance in Environmental Protection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 109(48):153 - 154.

[17] Piotr Krajewski. The Impact of Public Environmental Protection Expenditure on Economic Growth. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016, 11(2):99-104.

[18] M. Asghari, M. Noaparast, S. Z. Shafaie. Recovery of coal particles from a tailing dam for environmental protection and economical beneficiations. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2018, 5(1):1-11.

[19] Butcher B, Xu Y. Chinese Tax Policy and the Promotion of Agricultural Cooperatives and Environmental Protection. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017, 31(4):649-669.

[20] Pokorny B, Jong W D. Smallholders and forest landscape transitions: locally devised development strategies of the tropical Americas/Petits exploitants et transitions de paysage forestier: strategies de developpement des Ameriques tropicales formees localement/Los pequenos productores y la transicion de los paisajes forestales: estrategias de desarrollo locales las Americas tropicales. International Forestry Review, 2015, 17(1):1-141.