Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Academic Journal of Energy, 2021, 2(1); doi: 10.38007/RE.2021.020101.

Sustainable Development Capability Evaluation of Coal Resource-Based Cities Based on WEAP Model

Author(s)

Xuefei Pang and Yangchun Li

Corresponding Author:
Yangchun Li
Affiliation(s)

College of Architecture and Engineering, Zhanjiang University of Science and Technology, Zhanjiang 524000, Guangdong, China

Abstract

From the perspective of my country and the world, the development of coal resource-based cities will inevitably lead to resource depletion. As the leading industry and economic pillar of urban development, coal resources will be fatal to the economic development of cities once the resources are exhausted. Therefore, how to realize the sustainable development(SD) of coal resource-based cities(CRBC) has become a long-term and urgent task in our country. M City is a city developed by relying on coal resources. Therefore, this paper takes M City as an example to analyze the economic development of M City from the perspectives of economic sustainability, social sustainability, resource sustainability and environmental sustainability, and uses the WEAP model to evaluate The average development efficiency of M city, and the ranking of M city's SD ability, and then put forward targeted improvement suggestions and measures to enhance the ability of SD. It is hoped that the research results of this paper can provide help and reference for the future development of CRBC.

Keywords

WEAP Model, Coal Resource-Based Cities, Sustainable Development Capability, Development Efficiency

Cite This Paper

Xuefei Pang and Yangchun Li. Sustainable Development Capability Evaluation of Coal Resource-Based Cities Based on WEAP Model. Academic Journal of Energy (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 1: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.38007/RE.2021.020101.

References

[1] Hussain R , Luo K . Geochemical valuation and intake of F, As, and Se in coal wastes contaminated areas and their potential impacts on local inhabitants, Shaanxi China. Environmental Geochemistry & Health, 2018, 40(6):2667-2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0131-y

[2] Marcos-Martinez R , Measham T G , Fleming-Munoz D A . Economic impacts of early unconventional gas mining: Lessons from the coal seam gas industry in New South Wales, Australia. Energy Policy, 2019, 125(FEB.):338-346.

[3] PPI, Asian, news, et al. In China, ambitious anti-coal campaign in Dongguan to impact several large P&B mills. PPI Asian news, 2018, 21(17):5-5.

[4] Howland E . Alberta grid operator releases capacity market plan. Platts Megawatt Daily, 2018, 23(21):5-6.

[5] Jacob S , Sibeud E . The permeable city - a resilient city capable of managing the resource sustainably. Betonwerk + Fertigteil-Technik, 2019, 85(4):80-85.

[6] Stanfield J . Nevada approves NV Energy resource plans for more solar, less coal. Platts Megawatt Daily, 2018, 23(247):6-7.

[7] Mehrparvar M , Ahmadi A , Safavi H R . Resolving water allocation conflicts using WEAP simulation model and non-cooperative game theory. Simulation, 2020, 96(1):17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549719844827

[8] Coteur I , Marchand F , Debruyne L , et al. Participatory tuning agricultural sustainability assessment tools to Flemish farmer and sector needs. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2018, 69(MAR.):70-81.

[9] Meier M , Tam M . Shaping Effective Practices for Incorporating Sustainability Assessment in Manuscripts Submitted to ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering : Biomaterials. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 9(22):7400-7402. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03382

[10] Barke A , Thies C , Popien J L , et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment of potential battery systems for electric aircraft. Procedia CIRP, 2021, 98(3):660-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.171

[11] Garg S , Agrawal V , Nagar R . Sustainability assessment of methods to prevent progressive collapse of RC flat slab buildings. Procedia CIRP, 2021, 98(3):25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.12.003

[12] Xr A , Wl A , Sd B , et al. Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: A novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method - ScienceDirect. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 59):34371-34384.

[13] Siksnelyte I , Zavadskas E K , Bausys R , et al. Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method. Energy Policy, 2019, 125(FEB.):90-102.

[14] Voegeli G , Hediger W , Romerio F . Sustainability assessment of hydropower: Using causal diagram to seize the importance of impact pathways. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2019, 77(JUL.):69-84.

[15] Rahla K M , Mateus R , Braganca L . Comparative sustainability assessment of binary blended concretes using Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 220(MAY 20):445-459.

[16] Sieti N , Rivera X , Stamford L , et al. Environmental sustainability assessment of ready-made baby foods: Meals, menus and diets. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 689(NOV.1):899-911.

[17] Berlese M , Corazzin M , Bovolenta S . Environmental sustainability assessment of buffalo mozzarella cheese production chain: A scenario analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 238(Nov.20):117922.1-117922.9.

[18] Costa D , Quinteiro P , Dias A C . A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 686(OCT.10):774-787.

[19] Ben Daya B , Nourelfath M . Sustainability assessment of integrated forest biorefinery implemented in Canadian pulp and paper mills. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 214(AUG.):248-265.