Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Distributed Processing System, 2021, 2(2); doi: 10.38007/DPS.2021.020207.

Coupled Distributed Systems Considering Multitasking Dynamic Scheduling Algorithms

Author(s)

Venpaty Velmugan

Corresponding Author:
Venpaty Velmugan
Affiliation(s)

Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet technology and the comprehensive arrival of the era of big data, the development of enterprise business scale and the rise of logic complexity make coupled distributed systems play an increasingly important role in enterprise-level applications. The multi-task dynamic scheduling scheme based on the proposed method has problems such as poor manageability, poor task scheduling ability and poor usability. Therefore, this paper studies and constructs the coupled distributed system considering the multi-task dynamic scheduling. This paper firstly introduces the relevant theories. In the system theory part, it mainly introduces the scheduling module, followed by the system design. In the system design part, the task scheduling is mainly designed. Finally, the system implementation is carried out. Scheduling accuracy is analyzed.

Keywords

Multitask Scheduling, Coupled Distributed System, Dynamic Scheduling, System Construction

Cite This Paper

Venpaty Velmugan. Coupled Distributed Systems Considering Multitasking Dynamic Scheduling Algorithms. Distributed Processing System (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 2: 51-58. https://doi.org/10.38007/DPS.2021.020207.

References

[1] Wang X, Shahidehpour M, Jiang C, et al. Resilience Enhancement Strategies for Power Distribution Network Coupled With Urban Transportation System. Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on, 2019, 10(4):4068-4079. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2848970

[2] Juliza J, Abdul R R, Hafiz F M, et al. Analysis on the Effect of Sensor Views in Image Reconstruction Produced by Optical Tomography System Using Charge-Coupled Device. IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2018, 27(4):1689-1696. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2783620

[3] Mmc A, Vndc A, Sm B, et al. Asymptotic stability for a strongly coupled Klein-Gordon system in an inhomogeneous medium with locally distributed damping - ScienceDirect. Journal of Differential Equations, 2020, 268( 2):447-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.08.011

[4] Almeida A F, Cavalcanti M M, Gonzalez R B, et al. Uniform decay rate estimates for the coupled semilinear wave system in inhomogeneous media with locally distributed nonlinear damping. Asymptotic Analysis, 2019, 117(41):1-45. https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-191547

[5] Limam A, Boukhatem Y, Benabderrahmane B. General Decay Result for a Type III Thermoelastic Coupled System with Acoustic Boundary Conditions in the Presence of Distributed Delay. Mathematical Physics Analysis and Geometry, 2021(2):175-200. https://doi.org/10.15407/mag17.02.175

[6] Falsone A, Prandini M. A Distributed Dual Proximal Minimization Algorithm for Constraint-Coupled Optimization Problems. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2020, 5(1):259-264.

[7] Webler C M, Zanchetta J P. Exponential stability for the coupled Klein–Gordon–Schrdinger equations with locally distributed damping in unbounded domains. Asymptotic Analysis, 2021, 123(3-4):289-315. https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-201634

[8] AFD Almeida, MM Cavalcanti, JP Zanchetta. Exponential stability for the coupled Klein-Gordon-Schrdinger equations with locally distributed damping. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2019, 8(4):847-865. https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2019041

[9] AF Almeida, MM Cavalcanti, JP Zanchetta. Exponential decay for the coupled Klein-Gordon-Schrödinger equations with locally distributed damping. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17(5):2039-2061. https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2018097

[10] Talaei B, Jagannathan S, Singler J. Output Feedback-Based Boundary Control of Uncertain Coupled Semilinear Parabolic PDE Using Neurodynamic Programming. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks & Learning Systems, 2018, 29(4):1263-1274.

[11] Aguilar C S. Scheduling distributed clusters of parallel machines: primal-dual and LP-based approximation algorithms. Computing reviews, 2018, 59(11):605-605.

[12] Irom K, Kazi A, Akter T. Improvised Priority based Round Robin CPU Scheduling. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2018, 179(32):7-16. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2018916722

[13] Sohrawordi M, Ali U, Uddin M P, et al. A Modified Round Robin Cpu Scheduling Algorithm With Dynamic Time Quantum. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2019, 7(2):422-429. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/8506

[14] Popovic M, Kordic B, Popovic M, et al. Online algorithms for scheduling transactions on python software transactional memory. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 16(1):85-104. https://doi.org/10.2298/SJEE1901085P

[15] Qamhieh M, George L, Midonnet S. Stretching algorithm for global scheduling of real-time DAG tasks. Real Time Systems, 2019, 55(1):32-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11241-018-9311-1

[16] Shetty S C. Machine Learning Approach to Select Optimal Task Scheduling Algorithm in Cloud. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 2021, 12(6):2565-2580.

[17] Solayman H E. A Comparison of Scheduling parallel program tasks based on Java Applet. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 2020, 2(9):1394 – 1403.

[18] Paul T, Hossain R, Samsuddoha M. Improved Round Robin Scheduling Algorithm with Progressive Time Quantum. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2019, 178(49):30-36. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019919419