Ocean engineering is a strategic emerging field of development enterprises, which has great development potential. At present, the world's offshore resources mainly include oil, natural gas, and offshore wind energy. The corresponding production platforms and supporting equipment have been spread all over the world, and the number of them is huge. Therefore, the safety and stability of offshore engineering work platforms are the primary concerns. In order to solve the shortcomings of the existing technical research on the detection of harmful substances in marine engineering, this paper discusses the concept of using functional equations and mass spectrometry for the detection of harmful substances and harmful substances in marine engineering. The experimental conditions of sample collection and mass spectrometry in the detection experiment of harmful substances in marine engineering are briefly introduced. In addition, the workflow design of the experimental model for the detection of harmful substances in marine engineering based on mass spectrometry is discussed. Finally, the application of mass spectrometry in the detection of harmful substances in marine engineering is analyzed experimentally. The experimental data shows that this paper proposes The recovery rate of the mass spectrometry method in the detection of harmful substances in marine engineering is as high as 86.6%, the detection accuracy is as high as 96.2%, and the proportion of the detection quantity is as high as 98.6%. Therefore, it can be seen that the mass spectrometry method in this paper is used in the detection of harmful substances in marine engineering applicability.

Haniy Abdullaha. Hazardous Substances in Ocean Engineering Based on Mass Spectrometry. Frontiers in Ocean Engineering (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 2: 33-40. https://doi.org/10.38007/FOE.2020.010205.

[1] Schiltz S B , Balnis J , Jaitovich A , et al. Use of Mass Spectrometry〣ased Proteomics to Investigate Protein Regulation Associated with COPD㏑elated Muscle Dysfunction. The FASEB Journal, 2020, 34(S1): https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.05256

[2] Nauta S P , Poeze M , Heeren R , et al. Clinical use of mass spectrometry (imaging) for hard tissue analysis in abnormal fracture healing. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2020, 58(6):897-913. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0857

[3] Borges M , Santos H , Vasconcelos G A , et al. The use of conductive polymers as a substrate for paper spray ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods, 2019, 11(27):3388-3400. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9AY00484J

[4] Hittawe M M , Afzal S , Jamil T , et al. Abnormal events detection using deep neural networks: application to extreme sea surface temperature detection in the Red Sea. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2019, 28(2):021012.1-021012.8. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.28.2.021012

[5] Escobar J , Sandoval S . Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for sea turtle skeleton detection in the Mexican Pacific. Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment, 2020, 1(1):4-12.

[6] Kuchma M O , Lotareva Z N , Slesarenko L A . Sea Ice Cover Detection of the Far Eastern Seas by Data of the MSU-MR Radiometer of the Meteor-M No. 2 Satellite. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2020, 57(9):1179-1187. 

[7] Southwell B J , Cheong J W , Dempster A G . A Matched Filter for Spaceborne GNSS-R Based Sea-Target Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, PP(99):1-10.

[8] Gamaleev V , Furuta H , Hatta A . Atomic Emission Spectroscopy of Microarc Discharge in Sea Water for On-Site Detection of Metals. IEEE Transactions on Plasma ence, 2019, 47(4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2901301

[9] Istomina L , Marks H , Huntemann M , et al. Improved cloud detection over sea ice and snow during Arctic summer using MERIS data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2020, 13(12):6459-6472. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6459-2020

[10] Sayama S . Suppression of Sea Clutter and Detection of Small Ship Observed by an S-band Radar. IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials, 2018, 138(5):217-223. https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejfms.138.217

[11] Pogorzelski S , Rochowski P , Grzegorczyk M , et al. Detection of Wavy Sea Surface Oil-Derivative Contamination with Forward Specular High-Frequency Scattering. Polish Maritime Research, 2020, 27(1):173-179.

[12] Sayama, Shuji. Suppression of sea clutter and detection of small ship observed by an S‐band Radar. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 2018, 101(9):10-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.12094

[13] Rosenberg L , Duk V , Ng W H . Detection in Sea Clutter Using Sparse Signal Separation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, PP(99):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR42522.2020.9114813

[14] Otosaka I , Rivas M B , Stoffelen A . Bayesian Sea Ice Detection With the ERS Scatterometer and Sea Ice Backscatter Model at C-Band. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(4):2248-2254. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2777670

[15] Otosaka I , Rivas M B , Stoffelen A . Bayesian Sea Ice Detection With the ERS Scatterometer and Sea Ice Backscatter Model at C-Band. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(4):2248-2254. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2777670

[16] Parera-Portell J A , Ubach R , Gignac C . An improved sea ice detection algorithm using MODIS: application as a new European sea ice extent indicator. The Cryosphere, 2020, 15(6):2803-2818. 

[17] Bu J ,  Yu K , Ni J , et al. Machine learning-based methods for sea surface rainfall detection from CYGNSS delay-doppler maps. GPS Solutions, 2020, 26(4):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-022-01320-5

[18] Schller F , Plenge-Feidenhans'L M K , Stets J D , et al. Assessing Deep-learning Methods for Object Detection at Sea from LWIR Images. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52( 21):64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.284