Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Frontiers in Ocean Engineering, 2021, 2(2); doi: 10.38007/FOE.2021.020206.

Platform Structure and Topology Optimization Design in Marine Engineering Based on Divide-and-Conquer Algorithm

Author(s)

Pushpitari Ijazen

Corresponding Author:
Pushpitari Ijazen
Affiliation(s)

The University of Sydney Business School, Australia

Abstract

In the research of modern intelligent algorithms, divide and conquer algorithms are also widely used. The divide-and-conquer algorithm has the characteristics of coping with the increase in the amount of data in large-scale data sets and high data dimensions. Combined with the research of platform structure topology optimization design, it is very important to improve the algorithm of design results under complex working conditions, which has important guiding significance for the research of platform structure and topology optimization design in marine engineering based on divide and conquer algorithm. In the experiment, the ten-bar plane pestle is taken as the research object, and the reliability optimization problem with stress as the limit state function under a single working condition is considered through numerical examples. The experimental results show that the reliability optimization method is feasible and reliable.

Keywords

Divide and Conquer Algorithm, Marine Engineering, Platform Structure, Topology Optimization Design

Cite This Paper

Pushpitari Ijazen. Platform Structure and Topology Optimization Design in Marine Engineering Based on Divide-and-Conquer Algorithm. Frontiers in Ocean Engineering (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 2: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.38007/FOE.2021.020206.

References

[1] Clason C , Kruse F , Kunisch K . Total variation regularization of multi-material topology optimization. Esaim Mathematical Modelling & Numerical Analysis, 2018, 52(1):275-303. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2017061

[2] Gupta D K , Langelaar M , Keulen F V . QR-patterns: artefacts in multiresolution topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(4):1335-1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2048-6

[3] Simonetti H L , Neves F , Almeida V S . Multiobjective topology optimization with stress and strain energy criteria using the SESO method and a Multicriteria Tournament Decision. Structures, 2021, 30(1):188-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.002

[4] Caivano R , Tridello A , Codegone M , et al. A new methodology for thermostructural topology optimization: Analytical definition and validation:. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 2021, 235(3):481-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420720970246

[5] Xie S , Yaji K , Takahashi T , et al. Topology optimization for incompressible viscous fluid flow using the lattice kinetic scheme. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2021, 97(2):251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.05.032

[6] Yin E , Seckley E M , Asiedu E K , et al. Stress Analysis And Topology Optimization Of A Chain Bucket Elevator Using Ansys. Acta Polytechnica, 2021, 61(1):292-306. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2021.61.0292

[7] Sun H . Topology optimization of multi-objective crashworthiness structure based on Improved Bi-directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2020, 61( 12):10603-10612. 

[8] Radman A . Combination of BESO and harmony search for topology optimization of microstructures for materials. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 90(2):650-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.024

[9] Benjamin P , Karen W , Max G . Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimization. SIAM Review, 2018, 60(3):550-591. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1082469

[10] Mahmodi G . Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 and CH4 using ZnO coated mesh: Effect of operational parameters and optimization. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 2018, 111(4):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2012.12.017

[11] Garg A , Gurvits L , Oliveira R , et al. Algorithmic and optimization aspects of Brascamp-Lieb inequalities, via Operator Scaling. Geometric & Functional Analysis, 2018, 28(1):1-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-018-0434-2

[12] Royer, Clément W, Wright S J . Complexity analysis of second-order line-search algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization. Siam Journal on Optimization, 2018, 28(2):1448-1477. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M1134329

[13] Aljarah I , Faris H , Mirjalili S . Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm. Soft Computing, 2018, 22(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2442-1

[14] Chaudhari K , Ukil A , Kandasamy N K , et al. Hybrid Optimization for Economic Deployment of ESS in PV-Integrated EV Charging Stations. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 14(1):106-116. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2713481

[15] Alipoor J , Miura Y , Ise T . Stability Assessment and Optimization Methods for Microgrid With Multiple VSG Units. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2018, 9(2):1462-1471. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2592508

[16] Kanzow C , Steck D , Wachsmuth D . An Augmented Lagrangian Method for Optimization Problems in Banach Spaces. Siam Journal on Control & Optimization, 2018, 56(1):272-291. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1107103

[17] Deepak, K, Sharma, et al. Balancing Private and Public Interests in Public–Private Partnership Contracts through Optimization of Equity Capital Structure:. Transportation Research Record, 2018, 2151(1):60-66. https://doi.org/10.3141/2151-08

[18] Anand A , Veciana G D . Resource Allocation and HARQ Optimization for URLLC Traffic in 5G Wireless Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2018, 36(11):2411-2421. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2018.2874122