With the rapid improvement of high-performance computer resources and CFD technology, numerical wave pools have attracted more and more scholars' attention due to their rich and diverse functions and low forecasting costs. Numerical wave pools and traditional physical experimental pools complement each other's advantages and disadvantages, and have become an indispensable and important means of ship hydrodynamic performance research, wave power generation and ocean engineering. This paper studies the task scheduling method of ocean engineering simulation calculation based on numerical pool. This paper introduces the CFD execution process, analyzes the characteristics of the CFD solving task, proposes an evaluation method for the task size, and finally compares the different algorithms.

Lizunov Sae. Task Scheduling Method of Ocean Engineering Simulation Calculation Based on Numerical Pool. Frontiers in Ocean Engineering (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 3: 11-20. https://doi.org/10.38007/FOE.2021.020302.

[1] Sasaki H , Iga Y . Numerical analysis of liquid droplet impingement on rough material surface with water pool. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2019, 12(4):277-284. https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2019.12.4.277

[2] Shaghaghi M , Adve R S , Zhen D . Multifunction Cognitive Radar Task Scheduling Using Monte Carlo Tree Search and Policy Networks. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2018, 12(12):1437-1447. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5276

[3] Jain R . EACO: An Enhanced Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing. International Journal of Security and its Applications, 2020, 13(4):91-100. https://doi.org/10.33832/ijsia.2019.13.4.09

[4] Radwal B R , Kumar S . Dynamic Scheduling Algorithm With Task Execution Time Estimation Method In Cloud. International Journal of Computerences & Engineering, 2018, 6(3):375-379. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v6i3.375379

[5] Malik R , Pena P N . Optimal Task Scheduling in a Flexible Manufacturing System using Model Checking - ScienceDirect. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51( 7):230-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.306

[6] Mohapatra S , Panigrahi C R , Pati B , et al. MSA: a task scheduling algorithm for cloud computing. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 2019, 8(3):283-297. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCC.2019.103912

[7] Mahato D P , Singh R S . Maximizing availability for task scheduling in on-demand computing-based transaction processing system using ant colony optimization. Concurrency, practice and experience, 2018, 30(11):1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4405

[8] Ziafat H , Babamir S M . Optimal selection of VMs for resource task scheduling in geographically distributed clouds using fuzzy c-mean and MOLP. Software, 2018, 48(10):1820-1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2601

[9] Mukherjee P , Pattnaik P K , Swain T , et al. Task scheduling algorithm based on multi criteria decision making method for cloud computing environment: TSABMCDMCCE. Open Computer Science, 2019, 9(1):279-291. https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2019-0016

[10] Singh R . A Hybrid Approach for Task Scheduling Problems in Parallel Systems using Task Duplication. International Journal of Computer Applications & Information Technology, 2019, 11(1):243-257.

[11] Bhalaji N . Delay Diminished Efficient Task Scheduling And Allocation For Heterogeneous Cloud Environment. Journal of Trends in Computer Science and Smart Technology, 2019, 01(1):51-62. https://doi.org/10.36548/jtcsst.2019.1.005

[12] Aljarah I , Faris H , Mirjalili S . Optimizing connection weights in neural networks using the whale optimization algorithm. Soft Computing, 2018, 22(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2442-1

[13] Limited Busy Periods in Response Time Analysis for Tasks Under Global EDF Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2021, 40(2):232-245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2020.2994265

[14] Mobility Aware Blockchain Enabled Offloading and Scheduling in Vehicular Fog Cloud Computing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(7):4212-4223. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3056461

[15] Lilla S , Orozco C , Borghetti A , et al. Day-Ahead Scheduling of a Local Energy Community: An Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers Approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(2):1132-1142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2944541

[16] Limited Busy Periods in Response Time Analysis for Tasks Under Global EDF Scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2021, 40(2):232-245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2020.2994265

[17] Mobility Aware Blockchain Enabled Offloading and Scheduling in Vehicular Fog Cloud Computing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(7):4212-4223. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3056461

[18] Rerkjirattikal P , Huynh V N , Sun O , et al. A Goal Programming Approach to Nurse Scheduling with Individual Preference Satisfaction. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2379091