Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Business Management and Economics and Trade, 2025, 6(1); doi: 10.38007/IJBMET.2025.060104.

Research on Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Business Administration and AI Development Strategies

Author(s)

Tong Chen

Corresponding Author:
Tong Chen
Affiliation(s)

Philippine Christian University Center for International Education, Manila, 1004, Philippines

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, their role in business administration is expanding, offering enhanced tools for automation, analysis, and communication. This paper presents a comparative study of two prominent LLMs: ChatGPT, created by the U.S.-based company OpenAI, and DeepSeek, a Chinese-developed open-source model. Relying on literature reviews, technical reports, and real-world use cases, the research examines their development paths, functional capabilities, implementation scenarios, and technical constraints. In addition, the study explores the broader AI development strategies in the United States and China by analyzing national policy directions, funding mechanisms, and institutional practices (Normile, 2025; OpenAI, 2023). In addition, the study explores the broader AI development strategies in the United States and China by analyzing national policy directions, funding mechanisms, and institutional practices (Normile, 2025; OpenAI, 2023). The comparison highlights notable differences in effectiveness, transparency, and customization potential between the two models, providing practical insights for businesses navigating AI selection under diverse regulatory and global conditions.

Keywords

ChatGPT; DeepSeek; AI Technology; Business Administration; AI Development Strategies

Cite This Paper

Tong Chen. Research on Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and DeepSeek in Business Administration and AI Development Strategies. International Journal of Business Management and Economics and Trade (2024), Vol. 6, Issue 1: 32-38. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJBMET.2025.060104.

References

[1] Brookings Institution. (2025). The role of policies on technology and AI for innovation and increased competitiveness in North America. In USMCA Forward 2025 (Brookings Report). Retrieved from https://brookings.edu 

[2] Grant, C. (2025, February 4). DeepSeek: What you need to know about China’s answer to ChatGPT. O’Brien Media. Retrieved from https://obrienmedia.co.uk 

[3] Hu, K. (2023, February 2). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base – analyst note. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com

[4] ITIF (Information Technology & Innovation Foundation). (2024, August 26). How innovative is China in AI? Retrieved from https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/26/how-innovative-is-china-in-ai/

[5] Kaput, M. (2024, December 3). Enterprise adoption of ChatGPT: How it’s actually going. Marketing AI Institute. Retrieved from https://www.marketingaiinstitute.com/blog/enterprise-adoption-chatgpt-ai

[6] Normile, D. (2025, January 15). Chinese firm’s faster, cheaper AI language model makes a splash. Science, 387(6731), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.z18lyzw

[7] Omaar, H. (2024, August 26). How innovative is China in AI? ITIF Report. Retrieved from https://itif.org

[8] OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report (arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774). OpenAI Technical Report.

[9] Shankar, A. (2023, July 30). Adoption, usage, limitations of ChatGPT inside the enterprise (Interview with Bern Elliot, Gartner). Intelligent CIO Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.intelligentcio.com

[10] Young, S. (2025, February 25). DeepSeek, ChatGPT, and the global fight for technological supremacy. Harvard Law Today. Retrieved from https://hls.harvard.edu/today/deepseek-chatgpt-and-the-global-fight-for-technological-supremacy/