This study conducted an in-depth analysis based on the question of how AI (artificial intelligence) technology affects audience engagement and learning satisfaction in educational live broadcasts. To solve this problem, the study used a combination of questionnaire surveys and data analysis to collect feedback data from audiences who participated in AI education live courses, and conducted quantitative analysis using statistical software. The results showed that the average participation rate of AI-based education live broadcasts was 97.19%, and the highest learning satisfaction rate reached 92.9%. This result shows that the application of AI technology in educational live broadcast can effectively enhance the audience's interactive experience and learning effect. Therefore, the study believes that AI technology is an effective strategy to improve the quality of educational live broadcast and the audience's learning experience, and it is worthy of further promotion and application in the field of education.

Yanyun Guo. Analysis and Research on Audience Engagement and Learning Satisfaction of AI-Based Educational Live Broadcast. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science (2024), Vol. 5, Issue 1: 88-95. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJEIS.2024.050111.

[1] Liu Min. Research on the construction of online high-quality courses of "live broadcast marketing" in vocational colleges under the background of education digitalization [J]. Occupation, 2024, (18): 80-83.

[2] Zhang Lanping. Research on the application of online live broadcast teaching mode in adult academic education [J]. Journal of Northwest Adult Education College, 2024, (04): 18-24.

[3] Grafton-Clarke C, Uraiby H, Gordon M, et al. Pivot to online learning for adapting or continuing workplace-based clinical learning in medical education following the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 70[J]. Medical teacher, 2022, 44(3): 227-243.

[4] Liao S H, Widowati R, Puttong P. Data mining analytics investigate Facebook Live stream users’ behaviors and business models: The evidence from Thailand[J]. Entertainment Computing, 2022, 41(1): 100478-100483.

[5] Xue E, Li J, Xu L. Online education action for defeating COVID-19 in China: An analysis of the system, mechanism and mode[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2022, 54(6): 799-811.

[6] Heyang T, Martin R. Teaching through TikTok: a duoethnographic exploration of pedagogical approaches using TikTok in higher dance education in China and Norway during a global pandemic[J]. Research in Dance Education, 2024, 25(3): 343-358.

[7] Kim J H, Lee B S, Choi S J. A study on metaverse construction and use cases for non-face-to-face education[J]. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 2022, 8(1): 483-497.

[8] Alenezi M, Wardat S, Akour M. The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(6): 4782.

[9] Wang Yuan. Research on the integration strategy of online live broadcast and classroom teaching and its application in college education [J]. Knowledge Library, 2024, 40(12): 135-138.

[10] Gai Yueshuai, Liu Yijiang. Exploration of ideological and political education paths for college students in agricultural and forestry colleges under the perspective of online live broadcast [J]. Journal of Journalism Research, 2024, 15(10): 170-173.

[11] Xu Yan. Research on the practice of open education live teaching based on Tencent Classroom [J]. China Modern Education Equipment, 2024, (11): 18-21.