Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science, 2026, 7(1); doi: 10.38007/IJEIS.2026.070115.

Integrating Artificial Intelligence Courses into Master’s-Level Management Education at Engineering-Oriented Universities: Pathways and Practice

Author(s)

Xinna Zhao1,2, Chenyang Bao1,2

Corresponding Author:
Xinna Zhao
Affiliation(s)

1Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China

2Beijing Research Base for Modern Industrial New Area Development, Beijing 102617, China

Abstract

The expanding use of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizational decision-making creates new requirements for postgraduate management education. For engineering-oriented universities, the challenge is to connect technological expertise with managerial reasoning through a coherent educational framework. This paper examines how AI courses can be embedded across master’s-level management programs, with particular attention to the Chinese higher education context. Using a design-oriented conceptual synthesis of research on AI literacy, constructive alignment, management, and responsible AI, the paper proposes a framework organized around five competencies: managerial problem formulation, data and model reasoning, AI-supported inquiry, organizational implementation, and responsible judgment. These competencies are developed through entry-level diagnosis, foundational courses, discipline-specific modules, integrative projects, and thesis supervision. A constructed supply chain management scenario illustrates how the framework could translate into teaching practice. The paper also proposes an evaluation strategy that distinguishes AI-assisted task performance from independent understanding and delayed transfer. Its principal contribution is a program-level approach that connects learning outcomes, authentic management tasks, individual evidence, and institutional coordination. The framework has not been empirically validated; its educational effectiveness and implementation costs require subsequent investigation. Nevertheless, it provides a practical foundation for developing AI-informed managerial judgment while preserving disciplinary depth and academic independence.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; management education; master’s programs; engineering-oriented universities; curriculum integration; responsible AI

Cite This Paper

Xinna Zhao, Chenyang Bao, Integrating Artificial Intelligence Courses into Master’s-Level Management Education at Engineering-Oriented Universities: Pathways and Practice. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Science (2026), Vol. 7, Issue 1: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.38007/IJEIS.2026.070115.

References

[1] Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044

[2] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, & National Data Administration. (2026, April 2). “Artificial intelligence + education” action plan [Policy document, in Chinese]. Official document

[3] Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

[4] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

[5] Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. Publication

[6] Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

[7] Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

[8] Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. Publication

[9] Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

[10] Tabassi, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

[11] Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122