Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Academic Journal of Environmental Biology, 2020, 1(2); doi: 10.38007/AJEB.2020.010203.

Biological Monitoring System of Water Environment Based on Human-computer Interaction Technology


Manzin Anue

Corresponding Author:
Manzin Anue

Shabakeh Pardaz Azarbaijan, Iran


With the continuous development of the national economy and society, the concept of sustainable development also puts forward new requirements for the development of water conservancy, and the pollution of lakes hinders the development of water environment. It can be seen that the management of river and lake environment is particularly important. Monitoring and early warning of biological dynamics in the aquatic environment is particularly important. The purpose of this paper is to study the biological monitoring system of water environment based on human-computer interaction technology. It is proposed to combine computer human-computer interaction technology with water quality biological monitoring technology, and try to design a biological water quality monitoring system to realize comprehensive monitoring of water quality and early warning of water pollution. Through the research and analysis of the environmental monitoring system based on human-computer interaction, a set of client-side human-computer interaction scheme and UI scheme suitable for the system is designed and implemented, and the system is tested for biological monitoring of water environment.


Human-computer Interaction, Aquatic Environment Biology, Biological Monitoring, Monitoring System

Cite This Paper

Manzin Anue. Biological Monitoring System of Water Environment Based on Human-computer Interaction Technology. Academic Journal of Environmental Biology (2020), Vol. 1, Issue 2: 18-25. https://doi.org/10.38007/AJEB.2020.010203.


[1] Whoriskey F . Electronic Telemetry for Monitoring Aquatic Animals and Canada's Ocean Tracking Network. The journal of ocean technology, 2018, 13(1):11-21.

[2] Rocha M, Dourado P, Cardoso C, et al. Tools for monitoring aquatic environments to identify anthropic effects. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2018, 190(2):61.1-61.13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6440-2

[3] Daniela G, Carlos M . Crop landscapes reduced taxonomic and functional richness but increased evenness of aquatic macroinvertebrates in subtropical rivers. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191(11):702.1-702.11.

[4] Russell D, Morris C D, Duck C D, et al. Monitoring long‐term changes in UK grey seal pup production. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2019, 29(S1):24-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3100

[5] Sumon, Kizar, Ahmed, et al. Environmental monitoring and risk assessment of organophosphate pesticides in aquatic ecosystems of north-west Bangladesh. Chemosphere: Environmental toxicology and risk assessment, 2018, 206(Sep.):92-100.

[6] Jeong Y, Schaeffer A, Smith K . A comparison of equilibrium and kinetic passive sampling for the monitoring of aquatic organic contaminants in German rivers. Water Research, 2018, 145(NOV.15):248-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.016

[7] Mcdonough K, Itrich N, Menzies J, et al. Environmental fate of amine oxide: Using measured and predicted values to determine aquatic exposure. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616-617(mar.):164-171.

[8] Costa M B, Tavares F V, Martinez C B, et al. Accumulation and effects of copper on aquatic macrophytes Potamogeton pectinatus L.: Potential application to environmental monitoring and phytoremediation. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 2018, 155(JUL.):117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.062

[9] Somers, Keith, M, et al. An Adaptive Environmental Effects Monitoring Framework for Assessing the Influences of Liquid Effluents on Benthos, Water, and Sediments in Aquatic Receiving Environments. Integrated environmental assessment and management. 2018, 14(5):552-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4060

[10] Saeidi Z, Vatandoost H . Aquatic Insect from Iran for Possible Use of Biological Control of Main Vector-Borne Disease of Malaria and Water Indicator of Contamination. Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, 2018, 12(1):1-15.

[11] Galarza E, Cabrera M, Espinosa R, et al. Assessing the Quality of Amazon Aquatic Ecosystems with Multiple Lines of Evidence: The Case of the Northeast Andean Foothills of Ecuador. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2020, 107(1):52-61.

[12] MA Arguello-Pérez, RY Pérez-Rodríguez, JA Díaz-Gómez, et al. Review of the biomonitoring of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances in aquatic ecosystems of Mexico: 2001-2016. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 2020, 48(5):705-738.

[13] Basto M N, Nicastro K R, Tavares A I, et al. Plastic ingestion in aquatic birds in Portugal. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2019, 138(JAN.):19-24.

[14] Fluet-Chouinard E, Stewart-Koster B, Davidson N, et al. Reciprocal insights from global aquatic stressor maps and local reporting across the Ramsar wetland network. Ecological indicators, 2020, 109(Feb.):105772.1-105772.9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105772

[15] Neuparth T, Lopes A I, Alves N, et al. Does the antidepressant sertraline show chronic effects on aquatic invertebrates at environmentally relevant concentrations? A case study with the keystone amphipod, Gammarus locusta. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 183(Nov.):109486.1-109486.7.

[16] Slimani N, Sanchez-Fernandez D, Guilbert E, et al. Assessing potential surrogates of macroinvertebrate diversity in North-African Mediterranean aquatic ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 101(JUN.):324-329.

[17] Nicastro K R, Savio R L, Mcquaid C D, et al. Plastic ingestion in aquatic-associated bird species in southern Portugal. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 126(JAN.):413-418.

[18] Harada M, Kume M, Mochioka N, et al. Japanese eel Anguilla japonica and aquatic animals collected with Ishi-kura net in the Iroha and Katsura Rivers, Oita Prefecture, Japan (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 2018, 84(1):45-53. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.17-00032

[19] Haldar S, Kim Y, Mishra S R, et al. The Patient Advice System: A Technology Probe Study to Enable Peer Support in the Hospital. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 4(CSCW2):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415183

[20] Caldeira C, Figueiredo M C, Dodakian L, et al. Towards Supporting Data-Driven Practices in Stroke Telerehabilitation Technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2020, 5(CSCW1):1-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449099

[21] Vorm E S, Dasgupta P . Computer-Centered Humans: Why Human-AI Interaction Research Will Be Critical to Successful AI Integration in the DoD. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 2020, 35(4):112-116. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2020.3013133