Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Academic Journal of Environmental Biology, 2021, 2(2); doi: 10.38007/AJEB.2021.020202.

Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity based on Ecological Footprint

Author(s)

Dazhi Xu, Yu Yuan and Xiaoyong Xiao

Corresponding Author:
Dazhi Xu
Affiliation(s)

College of Economics and Management, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, Hunan, China

Abstract

Water resources(WR) have gradually become a key factor affecting the stable expand of social economy. In this context, it is of great practical significance to evaluate and simulate the regional WR carrying capacity(CC), analyze the WR CC, and find the shortcomings of the current WR system. This paper mainly studies the evaluation of WR CC based on ecological footprint(EF). In this paper, the concept of WR CC is expounded and the calculation formula of water EF is analyzed. The EF model was used to calculate the EF and CC of WR in A city. The study of WR CC has important theoretical and practical significance for the scientific and rational expand and utilization of local WR, economic expand, environmental protection, ecological balance and harmony between man and land.

Keywords

Ecological Footprint, Water Resources Carrying Capacity, Water resources Utilization, Ecological Evaluation

Cite This Paper

Dazhi Xu, Yu Yuan and Xiaoyong Xiao. Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity based on Ecological Footprint. Academic Journal of Environmental Biology (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 2: 12-20. https://doi.org/10.38007/AJEB.2021.020202.

References

[1] Mamat H S, Husen E . Socio-economic aspect and CC of agricultural land resources to support the expand of strategic agricultural commodities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 648(1):012019 (8pp).

[2] Windupranata W, Rahma A, Chairuniza G, et al. Analysis of small island environmental CC in Panggang Island, Jakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 777(1):012033 (10pp).

[3] Mcclelland C, Denny C K, Larsen T A, et al. Landscape estimates of CC for grizzly bears using nutritional energy supply for management and conservation planning. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2021, 62(5204):126018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126018

[4] Njurumana G N, Pujiono E, MMD Silva, et al. Ecological performance of local initiatives on WR management in Timorese communities, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 914(1):012031 (7pp).

[5] Negoro Y, Marthanty D R, Soeryantono H . Analysis of the green infrastructure implementation to the enhancement of environmental support capacity (Case study: Watershed outside University of Indonesia). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1098(2):022050 (7pp).

[6] Syahidin U, Komariah, Murti S H . Groundwater vulnerability in karst area Pucung Village, Eromoko, Wonogiri District. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 824(1):012034 (9pp).

[7] Karabulut A A, Crenna E, Sala S, et al. A proposal for integration of the ecosystem-water-food-land-energy (EWFLE) nexus concept into life cycle assessment: A synthesis matrix system for food security. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 172(PT.4):3874-3889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.092

[8] Novoa V, Ahumada-Rudolph R, Rojas O, et al. Sustainability assessment of the agricultural water footprint in the Cachapoal River basin, Chile. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 98(MAR.):19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.048

[9] Purba S A, Slamet B, Rauf A . Land use directions based on the level of land conversion vulnerability in the Padang Watersheds, North Sumatera. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 912(1):012005 (7pp).

[10] Gunawan T A, Daud A, Haki H, et al. The Estimation of Total Sediments Load in River Tributary for Sustainable Resources Management. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 248(1):012079.

[11] Musikavong C, Gheewala S H . EF assessment towards eco-efficient oil palm and rubber plantations in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140(pt.2):581-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.159

[12] Genta C, Favaro S, Sonetti G, et al. Envisioning green solutions for reducing the EF of a university campus. International journal of sustainability in higher education, 2019, 20(3):423-440.

[13] Bortoli L D, Schabbach L M, Fredel M C, et al. EF of biomaterials for implant dentistry: is the metal-free practice an eco-friendly shift?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 213(MAR.10):723-732.

[14] Pizarro O, Friedman A, Bryson M, et al. A simple, fast, and repeatable survey method for underwater visual 3D benthic mapping and monitoring. Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 7(6):1770-1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2701

[15] Johannesson S E, Daviosdottir B, Heinonen J T . Standard EF Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies. Ecological Economics, 2018, 146(APR.):370-380.

[16] Martinez-Rocamora A, Solis-Guzman J, Marrero M . EF of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Maintenance tasks and final results. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 155(nov.):339-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.038

[17] Adjei R, Addaney M, Danquah L . The EF and environmental sustainability of students of a public university in Ghana: developing ecologically sustainable practices. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2021, 22(7):1552-1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2020-0318

[18] Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Adediran A, et al. EF, urbanization, and energy consumption in South Africa: including the excluded. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(30). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05924-2