Welcome to Scholar Publishing Group

Academic Journal of Environmental Biology, 2021, 2(2); doi: 10.38007/AJEB.2021.020205.

Advanced Treatment of Urban Sewage Sludge by Upflow Aerated Biological Filter

Author(s)

Sujatan Kazemzadeh

Corresponding Author:
Sujatan Kazemzadeh
Affiliation(s)

Griffith University, Australia

Abstract

In today's world, due to industrial and agricultural development, population explosion, water abuse and pollution, the water crisis caused by water shortage and water pollution has become a complex problem faced by most countries in terms of policy, economy and society. As a new type of wastewater treatment process, biological filter has been widely used at home and abroad. The purpose of this work is to study the characteristics of starting the hanging film culture after the advanced treatment of urban sewage sludge by aerated biological up-flow filter. By changing the ammonia nitrogen concentration, hydraulic retention time and filter material filling height, the treatment efficiency of the aerated biological filter was studied, and the optimal process operating conditions were determined and optimized. Using aerated biological up-flow filter to treat sewage sludge in M city, the COD removal rate is the lowest 30%, the highest removal rate is 47%; the turbidity removal results show that the highest removal rate is 92%, and the lower removal rate is 71%.

Keywords

Upflow Aeration, Biological Filter, Advanced Treatment, Municipal Sewage Sludge

Cite This Paper

Sujatan Kazemzadeh. Advanced Treatment of Urban Sewage Sludge by Upflow Aerated Biological Filter. Academic Journal of Environmental Biology (2021), Vol. 2, Issue 2: 39-46. https://doi.org/10.38007/AJEB.2021.020205.

References

[1] Weaver J E, Himmel W J . Relation Of Increased Water Content And Decreased Aeration To Root Development In Hydrophytes. Plant Physiology, 2019, 5(1):69-92. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.5.1.69

[2] Treesubsuntorn C, Thiravetyan P . Botanical Biofilter for Indoor Toluene Removal and Reduction of Carbon dioxide Emission under Low Light Intensity by Using Mixed C3 and CAM Plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 194(SEP.1):94-100.

[3] Varma V S, Prasad R, Deb S, et al. Effects of Aeration During Pile Composting of Water Hyacinth Operated at Agitated, Passive and Forced Aerated Condition. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2018, 9(8):1339-1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9876-2

[4] Nguyen A T Q, Nguyen A M, Nguyen M T, et al. The regulatory role of CO2on nutrient releases from ashed rice straw phytoliths. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 160(1):35-47.

[5] Porte H, Kougias P G, Alfaro N, et al. Process performance and microbial community structure in thermophilic trickling biofilter reactors for biogas upgrading. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 655(MAR.10):529-538.

[6] Valdez-Castillo M, Saucedo-Lucero J O, Villalobos-Romero K L, et al. Steady-state operation of a biofilter coupled with photocatalytic control of bacterial bioaerosol emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(3):1-11.

[7] Mckie M J, Ziv-El M C, Taylor-Edmonds L, et al. Biofilter scaling procedures for organics removal: A potential alternative to piloting. Water Research, 2019, 151(MAR.15):87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.006

[8] Saucedo-Lucero J O, Revah S . Monitoring key organic indoor pollutants and their elimination in a biotrickling biofilter. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(10):9806-9816.

[9] Subari F, Kamaruzzaman M A, Abdullah S S, et al. Simultaneous Removal of Ammonium and Manganese in Slow Sand Biofilter (SSB) by Naturally Grown Bacteria from Lake Water and Its Diverse Microbial Community. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(5):6351-6358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.09.053

[10] Terry, Leigh, G, et al. Biodegradable organic matter and rapid-rate biofilter performance: A review. Water research: A journal of the international water association, 2018, 128(Jan.1):234-245.

[11] Khorsandi H, Gholizadeh M, Aghapour A A . Catechol biodegradation by a novel hybrid anoxic biofilter (HAB). Environmental Technology, 2018, 41(7):1-21.

[12] Salini N G, Antony R . The heterostructured nanocomposite of EPS/PVA/Ag-TiO2 for sewage treatment by COD removal. Emergent Materials, 2021, 5(2):369-379.

[13] Yamane T, Yoshida N, Sugioka M . Estimation of total energy requirement for sewage treatment by a microbial fuel cell with a one-meter air-cathode assuming Michaelis–Menten COD degradation. RSC Advances, 2021, 11(33):20036-20045. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA03061B

[14] Perkins R, Whitehead M, Goulson D . Dead in the water: comment on "Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products". Environmental Sciences Europe, 2021, 33(1):1-6.

[15] Valdez-Castillo M, Saucedo-Lucero J O, Villalobos-Romero K L, et al. Steady-state operation of a biofilter coupled with photocatalytic control of bacterial bioaerosol emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(3):1-11.

[16] Devault D A, Amalric L, Bristeau S, et al. Removal efficiency of emerging micropollutants in biofilter wastewater treatment plants in tropical areas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(15):1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10868-z

[17] Siswanto D, Permana B H, Treesubsuntorn C, et al. Sansevieria trifasciata and Chlorophytum comosum botanical biofilter for cigarette smoke phytoremediation in a pilot-scale experiment—evaluation of multi-pollutant removal efficiency and CO2 emission. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13(1):109-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00775-9

[18] Elikten H, Kuzu S L, Saral A, et al. Performance evaluation of a full-scale open bed biolter through on-site measurements and CFD analyses. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 152(22):692-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.047